« New York Times rings in new year with old arguments against death penalty | Main | "Plead Guilty or Go to Prison for Life" »

January 2, 2013

"Crime, Punishment, and Politics: An Analysis of Political Cycles in Criminal Sentencing"

The title of this post is the title of this new paper by Carlos Berdejo and Noam Yuchtman now available via SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

Whether judges respond to political pressure is an important question occupying social scientists. We present evidence that Washington State judges respond to such pressure by sentencing serious crimes more severely.  Sentences are around 10% longer at the end of a judge's political cycle than the beginning; deviations above the sentencing guidelines increase by 50% across the electoral cycle.  We conduct robustness and falsi fication exercises and distinguish between judges' election cycles and other officials' by exploring non-linear eff ects of electoral proximity.  Our fi ndings inform debates over judicial elections, and highlight the interaction between judicial discretion and the influence of judicial elections.

January 2, 2013 at 12:01 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e2017d3f66a93f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Crime, Punishment, and Politics: An Analysis of Political Cycles in Criminal Sentencing":

Comments

This study is reminiscent of that of the Israeli judges who are more lenient after eating lunch, and no longer hungry.

Both factors would violate procedural due process and should be raised as reversible errors.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Jan 2, 2013 12:46:20 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB