« "'The Judge, He Cast His Robe Aside': Mental Health Courts, Dignity and Due Process" | Main | Does new Eighth Amendment limits on juve sentencing redefine requirements of juve transfer proceedings? »

March 13, 2013

An effective primer on the federal tax issues facing state marijuana businesses

This notable new Forbes commentary by attorney Robert Wood, headlined "Dude, Can Marijuana Beat The Tax Man?," provides an effective overview of notable new issues raised by the intersection of modern marijuana reform and not-so-modern federal tax laws.   Here are excerpts from this latest piece (with links to some key resources in this area):

Aren’t marijuana growers, dealers and dispensaries just trying to pay their taxes and make a profit like everybody else?  In the staid world of tax law, it can seem downright strange to be worried whether someone has “trafficking” tax problems.  Such is the odd symbiosis between conflicting federal and state laws.

Federal law still outlaws marijuana even in states that legalize it.  Reminiscent of Al Capone, that makes taxes a big problem.... [L]egal dispensaries are still drug traffickers to the feds, so Section 280E of the tax code denies their tax deductions. Intended to prevent tax deductions by drug dealers, it covers medical marijuana too.  The IRS says it must enforce Section 280E no matter what state law says.

Indeed, of all the federal enforcement efforts, taxes hurt most.  “The federal tax situation is the biggest threat to businesses and could push the entire industry underground,” the leading trade publication for the marijuana industry reports.  One answer is for dispensaries to deduct other expenses distinct from dispensing marijuana. See Californians Helping to Alleviate Medical Problems Inc. v. Commissioner.

If a dispensary sells marijuana and is in the separate business of care-giving, the care-giving expenses are deductible.  If only 10% of the premises are used to dispense marijuana, most of the rent is deductible.  Good record-keeping is essential.  See Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Persist Despite Tax Obstacles.

Another idea is that Marijuana sellers might operate as nonprofit social welfare organizations.  See Growing the Business: How Legal Marijuana Sellers Can Beat a Draconian Tax.  That way Section 280E shouldn’t apply.  A social welfare organization must promote the common good and general welfare of people in its neighborhood or community.  Operating businesses in distressed neighborhoods to provide jobs and job-training for residents?  That could fit a dispensary nicely.

Meanwhile, Congressmen Jared Polis (D-CO) and Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) introduced a bill to end the federal prohibition on marijuana and allow it to be taxed.  This legislation would remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act.  That way growers, sellers and users could no longer fear violating federal law.  Their Marijuana Tax Equity Act would also impose an excise tax on cannabis sales and an annual occupational tax on workers dealing in the growing field of legal marijuana.

March 13, 2013 at 10:09 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e2017c37a0dd91970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference An effective primer on the federal tax issues facing state marijuana businesses:

Comments

I still say that until the febs stop being the drug nazi's....they got not one thin dime of any money made in these business.

Posted by: rodsmith | Mar 14, 2013 9:50:48 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB