« "Convicted rapist asks Supreme Court for death penalty" | Main | Following prosecutor recommendation, Texas jury gives repeat felon 50-year sentence for theft of ribs »

June 1, 2013

"Amoral Numbers and Narcotics Sentencing"

The title of this post is the headline of this notable new article authored by Mark Osler and now available via SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Americans are fascinated with lists and rankings. Magazines catch the eye with covers promising “92 Cute Summer Looks,” college football fans anxiously await the release of pre-season rankings, and law schools have reshaped themselves in reaction to the rankings released by U.S. News and World Report.  With each of these, though, the lists often do more to create a reality than to reflect one, with distinct negative effects. The same problem plagues federal narcotics sentencing, where rankings of the relative seriousness of crimes are embedded in sentencing guidelines and minimum sentences required by statutes, though they are rooted neither in empirical evidence nor a consistent theory of problem-solving.

June 1, 2013 at 06:54 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e20192aa96a151970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Amoral Numbers and Narcotics Sentencing":

Comments

don't have access to SSRN:

"Amoral"?

is this an atheistic manner of saying "wrong" or
evolutionarily disadvantageous?

Posted by: Adamakis | Jun 1, 2013 11:48:52 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB