« DOJ delivers important messages in annual letter to US Sentencing Commission | Main | "Juveniles, Sex Offenses, and the Scope of Substantive Law" »

July 13, 2013

"Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment"

The title of this post is the title of this great-looking new article by Richard A. Bierschbach and Stephanos Bibas. Here is the abstract:

Since the turn of the century, the Supreme Court has begun to regulate non-capital sentencing under the Sixth Amendment in the Apprendi line of cases (requiring jury findings of fact to justify sentence enhancements) as well as under the Eighth Amendment in the Miller and Graham line of cases (forbidding mandatory life imprisonment for juvenile defendants).  Though both lines of authority sound in individual rights, in fact they are fundamentally about the structures of criminal justice.  These two seemingly disparate lines of doctrine respond to structural imbalances in non-capital sentencing by promoting morally appropriate punishment judgments that are based on retail, individualized input and reflect the views and perspectives of multiple institutional actors.

This new understanding illuminates how both doctrines relate to the Court’s earlier regulation of capital sentencing and how checks and balances can promote just punishment in a pluralistic system.  It also underscores the need for other actors to complete the Court’s work outside the confines of rights-based judicial doctrines, by experimenting with a broader range of reforms that are not constitutionally required but rather are constitutionally inspired.

July 13, 2013 at 10:59 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e20192abfe4aa3970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment":

Comments

The idea that nine Ivy indoctrinated, pro-criminal, lawyer, mental cripples can set criminal law policy explains why there are 20 million FBI Index felonies. These are traitors to the nation, acting in bad faith, to enhance lawyer rent seeking. If crime is to be eliminated, these lawyer traitors to the nation must be removed bu Congress. Unfortunately, lawyers totally control Congress, and will never fix the Supreme Court. The lawyers totally controlling the Congress want to maintain the crime rate, to maintain government make work jobs, especially for lawyers.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Jul 14, 2013 7:08:54 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB