« SCOTUS again struggling with state-federal crime intersection in Castleman | Main | Orange County DA hoping California high court will rescue local sex offender park ban »

January 15, 2014

NY Times debates "Should Drug Enforcement Be Left to the States?"

The Room for Debate section of the New York Times has this great new set of short pieces concerning federalism and federal drug policies.   Here is the section's set up:

Vermont and a number of states have responded to increased drug use by emphasizing treatment and rehabilitation.  Washington and Colorado have legalized recreational use of marijuana, and the federal government has taken a hands-off approach there.  And the Justice Department has  pledged a less severe approach to drug cases over all.

But with more states taking different approaches to drugs, should the federal government even prosecute local drug cases?

Here are the contribututions, with links via the commentary titles

January 15, 2014 at 05:22 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201a3fc4493bb970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NY Times debates "Should Drug Enforcement Be Left to the States?":

Comments

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB