May 1, 2014
DEA head tells Senate DEA supports "scientific research efforts" concerning marijuana
As reported in this Washington Post article, headlined "DEA chief says marijuana-trafficking spiking in states near Colorado," the head of the Drug Enforcement Agency testified in Congress yesterday and expressed concerns about marijuana legalization and expressed support for mandatory minimum drug sentences:
Administrator Michele Leonhart said the DEA is troubled by the increase in marijuana trafficking in states surrounding Colorado and worries that the same phenomenon could be repeated around Washington state, where recreational marijuana is expected to be sold legally soon. In Kansas, she said, there has been a 61 percent increase in seizures of marijuana from Colorado.
Speaking to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Leonhart said the softening of attitudes nationwide about the risk of marijuana has confirmed some of the agency’s fears. “The trends are what us in law enforcement had expected would happen,” she said. “In 2012, 438,000 Americans were addicted to heroin. And 10 times that number were dependent on marijuana.”...
DEA officials have expressed frustration privately about the legalization of marijuana by Colorado and Washington state, where local officials consider the change an opportunity to generate tax revenue and boost tourism. But in January, James. L. Capra, the DEA’s chief of operations, called marijuana legalization at the state level “reckless and irresponsible,” and warned that the decriminalization movement would have dire consequences. “It scares us,” he said during a Senate hearing. “Every part of the world where this has been tried, it has failed time and time again.”...
On Wednesday, Leonhart spoke about why she thinks marijuana is dangerous. She said that marijuana-related emergency-room visits increased by 28 percent between 2007 and 2011 and that one in 15 high school seniors is a near-daily marijuana user. Since 2009, she said, more high school seniors have been smoking pot than smoking cigarettes....
Leonhart also spoke out in support of mandatory minimum sentencing for drug crimes, an issue Holder has highlighted recently as part of his initiative to reduce prison crowding and foster equity in criminal sentencing. Holder has instructed his 93 U.S. attorneys to use their discretion in charging low-level, nonviolent criminals with offenses that impose severe mandatory sentences.
Leonhart, in response to a question from Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), said: “Having been in law enforcement as an agent for 33 years [and] a Baltimore City police officer before that, I can tell you that for me and for the agents that work at the DEA, mandatory minimums have been very important to our investigations. We depend on those as a way to ensure that the right sentences equate the level of violator we are going after.”
Though the press coverage of the DEA chief's remarks suggest she is continuing the standard drug war posture of all modern administrations, her prepared testimony (available here) included thes three notable sentences about the DEA's support for medical marijuana research:
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and other components of the National Institutes of Health are conducting research to determine the possible role that active chemicals in marijuana, like tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, or other cannabinoids may play in treating autoimmune diseases, cancer, inflammation, pain, seizures, substance use disorders, and other psychiatric disorders. DEA supports these, scientific research efforts by providing Schedule I research registrations to qualified researchers. In fact, DEA has never denied a marijuana-related research application to anyone whose research protocol had been determined by the Department of Health and Human Services to be scientifically meritorious.
Perhaps these kinds of statements from DEA in support of "scientifically meritorious" medical marijuana research are not uncommon. Still, these sentences struck me as notable and telling in the context of the DEA chief's many other anti-marijuana-legalization comments.
May 1, 2014 at 10:32 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DEA head tells Senate DEA supports "scientific research efforts" concerning marijuana:
Maybe the DEA should do a remake of the BS film "reefer madness"
Posted by: Gary | May 1, 2014 7:04:00 PM
They should make tobacco illegal. It kills people. Lots of people reading this blog will die of it. This country is in denial. Smoke em if ya gottem.
Posted by: Liberty1st | May 1, 2014 8:48:18 PM
The entire testimony is an example of how laws and regulations place individuals in a "Catch 22" situation. It also exemplifies how government agencies are in the same "Catch 22" position.
Marijuana continues to be a schedule I drug on the Controlled Substance Act's schedule. This is a classification with no medical use. Because of this classification, requests for studies for medical use have been routinly turned down. The DEA could change this classification, but has for many years refused.
Tax money is used to advocate for keeping marijuana illegal, and also apparently is now being used to determine the medical use for marijuana. We're going down the rabbit hole.
Posted by: beth | May 2, 2014 1:24:25 PM