« Should I be hopeful Amy can now recover more restitution after major child porn bust in NYC? | Main | Has the ugly execution in Oklahoma succeeded in slowing US machineries of death? »

May 22, 2014

"Remodeling American Sentencing: A Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration"

The title of this post is the title of this notable new piece by Michael Tonry now available via SSRN. Here is the abstract:

When and if the will to roll back mass incarceration and create just, fair, and effective sentencing systems becomes manifest, the way forward is clear:

-First, three-strikes, mandatory minimum sentence, and comparable laws should be repealed.

-Second, any three-strikes, mandatory minimum sentence, or similar laws that are not repealed should be radically narrowed in scope and severity.

-Third, any three-strikes, mandatory minimum sentence, and similar laws that are not repealed should be changed to include provisions authorizing judges to impose some other sentence β€œin the interest of justice.”

-Fourth, LWOP laws should be repealed, or radically narrowed.

-Fifth, truth-in-sentencing laws should be repealed.

-Sixth, criminal codes should be amended to set substantially lower maximum sentences scaled to the seriousness of crimes.

-Seventh, every state should establish a sentencing commission and promulgate a presumptive sentencing guidelines system.

-Eighth, any state that does not establish an effective set of presumptive sentencing guidelines should establish a system of parole guidelines.

-Ninth, every state and the federal government should reduce its combined rate of jail and prison confinement to half its 2014 level by 2020.

-Tenth, every state should enact legislation making all prisoners serving fixed terms longer than five years, or indeterminate terms, eligible for consideration for release at the expiration of five years, and all prisoners aged 35 or over eligible for consideration for release after serving three years.

These proposals are evidence-based, and mostly technocratic.  Those calling for prison population targets and reducing the lengths of sentences being served may appear bold to some.  Relative to the problems they address they are modest and partial.  Reducing rates of imprisonment by half in the United States, a country with comparatively low crime rates, to a level that will remain 3 to 3.5 times those of other developed Western countries, can hardly be seen as overly ambitious.

May 22, 2014 at 09:55 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201a73dc9052f970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Remodeling American Sentencing: A Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration":

Comments

"When and if the will to roll back mass incarceration and create just, fair, and effective sentencing systems"

and

"LWOP laws should be repealed"

are mutually exclusive.

Posted by: Adamakis | May 22, 2014 1:18:25 PM

I have to give Adamakis this one. Some crimes just deserve LWOP. Just like some just demand Execution.

Posted by: rodsmith | May 22, 2014 5:45:07 PM

"Just like some just demand Execution."

Amen.

Posted by: Adamakis | May 22, 2014 8:32:33 PM

Are you surprised Adamakis? Bill will tell you if I think your wrong. You will hear about it. Just as quickly as you will hear it if I think your right.

Posted by: rodsmith | May 23, 2014 11:54:24 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB