« "Has Plea Bargaining Destroyed the Jury Trial?" | Main | "Looking Criminal and the Presumption of Dangerousness: Afrocentric Facial Features, Skin Tone, And Criminal Justice" »

November 28, 2017

"The Law of Abolition"

the title of this post is the title of this new article by Kevin Barry available via SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

Three themes have characterized death penalty abolition throughout the Western world: a sustained period of de facto abolition; an understanding of those in government that the death penalty implicates human rights; and a willingness of those in government to defy popular support for the death penalty.  The first two themes are present in the U.S.; what remains is for the U.S. Supreme Court to manifest a willingness to act against the weight of public opinion and to live up to history’s demands.

When the Supreme Court abolishes the death penalty, it will be traveling a well-worn road.  This Essay gathers, for the first time and all in one place, the opinions of judges who have advocated abolition of the death penalty over the past half-century, and suggests, through this “law of abolition,” what a Supreme Court decision invalidating the death penalty might look like.  Although no one can know for sure how history will judge the death penalty, odds are good that the death penalty will come to be seen as one of the worst indignities our nation has ever known and that a Supreme Court decision abolishing it will, in time, be widely accepted as right.

November 28, 2017 at 10:24 AM | Permalink

Comments

i agree. The death penalty should be abolished by statute in each state. Then the real one, the Italian Death Penalty may begin. The cost to the taxpayer will be a carton of cigarettes, instead of $millions wasted on lawyer employment for pointless, ridiculous, and frivolous claims and procedures.

The author does not understand. The current state of death penalty jurisprudence is perfectly tuned Supreme Court rent seeking. Kill almost no murderer. Increase complex legal proceedings to generate lawyer jobs, wasting $billions of hard earned tax payer money. The current condition is the preferred status to the Supreme Court that designed it and carefully tuned it.

Posted by: David Behar | Nov 28, 2017 4:13:40 PM

vaffanculo DB, vaffanculo stronzo.

Posted by: Claudio Giusti | Nov 29, 2017 2:12:03 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB