WPC" aux ..VDxh#{.z.([=H}Ԏo<VP:F ۩ɲ{\Lq\rAt(٢5igr-ZDpvxrO~F]i<(},.7.{DVw\e=Prź9 Né#}C P,R{r(ԘL&<~5]ZkcYTNdU/o8zmjƿZlWIRcs KP=M2ixfj,@@v`¬x˸hZs3IL-ѲTY4]/Nq k _'ɢJa6YFL':a+ Jz)7TU$>aj{ 'J|bgݝuPdVQ9#m3ȚcI xvmi;!Ցu&iiP@lq>U Nd % 0X\ 72 1jmN B A w7 4; O 0^ \ 1ud # f} 0!Ea 0 c^ ht mv 72 1 72F 1x 72 11 72^ 0DH 1 72 0wE 0 BF B*c 0 1-! 72!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! B!(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(|Y$҃XXx  c:\office\wpwin\template\legal\pleading.wpti)(CEKQW]cioAutoList1A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.Pleading Paper  '  0 .    d 77MXXdXXd7h0`3|x(*2A$ Y![XXx        0   3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)\\OSU-LAW_TREE\room326_lj5simx,,,,0 s L,[XXx   d     d xXA)) 3^dE02AA() 3^^dEt&2A  , == 1    , == 2 6   , == 3     , == 4 B    , == 5     , == 6 N     , == 7  $    , == 8 Z    , == 9 0    ,  10 f    ,  11 <   ,  12 r   ,  13 H   ,  14 ~   ,  15 T   ,  16    ,  17 `    ,  18 "   ,  19  l$   ,  20 !&   ,  21 (#x(   ,  22 $*   ,  23 4&!,   ,  24 ' #.   ,  25 @)$0   ,  26 *&2   ,  27 L,'4   ,  28(3L$ Y![XXx     d TABLE A(;k$2#  0  .3  0  0 UA.(CEKQW]cioAutoList2A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(CEKQW]cioAutoList3A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.(CEKQW]cioAutoList4A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A. A. T A$[XXx      1    _DefendantcitestothedissentinBlakelyforthepropositionthatriskofbodilyharmand  otherChapter2typeenhancementsmustbechargedinanindictmentandsubmittedtoajury. s Thispropositionismisplaced.First,thedissentpaintsapictureofwhatmaycometopass 6 shouldtheCourtexpandtheprinciplesinBlakely,ratherthanadefinitivestatementofwhat I Blakelymeans.SeeBlakely,2004WL1402697at*16.Second,theBlakelydissentisadissent,   notanopinionoftheCourt.(#$  0  0CEKQW_ekqAutoList5A.1.A.(1)A.A.A.A.$A.(O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#(b$0  0` (#(#2#   .3  0 ` (#` (# d&0 d d(xir$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2#(  0  )3  0 (# (#(hCEKQW]cioAutoList61.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.+1.  d Y![XXx    _! x X![ 3q  PAULK.CHARLTON  UnitedStatesAttorney B DistrictofArizona $ GARYM._RESTAINO_ H AssistantU.S.Attorney  TwoRenaissanceSquare l 40N.CentralAvenue,Suite1200  Phoenix,Arizona850044408 @  ArizonaStateBarNo.017450  "  Telephone(602)5147500 d   #[#@!GUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT |   @&GDISTRICTOFARIZONA R  -xXXx -*(ddd Xdd Xdd Xx&x&,dd ,dd +  '()   'UnitedStatesofAmerica, <  0 M 04 MM0 4 4 Plaintiff,r    0 M 04 MMv.5 4 4  TeresaCaballero_Velazquez_,   0 M 04 MM0 4 4 Defendant. :0"A  () :XqX[CR04407_PHX_Ԅ_EHC_ r   #[XXqv#UNITEDSTATESRESPONSETO H DEFENDANTSSUPPLEMENTAL   OBJECTIONTOPARAGRAPH19 ~  OFTHE_PRESENTENCE_ԀREPORT  A!  1'%#"  1  TheUnitedStates,throughundersignedcounsel,respondstodefendantssupplemental @% objectiontothe_PSR_Ԁbasedon_Blakely_Ԁv.Washington,2004WL1402697(2004).Defendant ' objectstotheimpositionofathreelevelsentencingenhancementforthespecificoffense L) characteristicofendangermentduringanaliensmugglingoffense,pursuantto_U.S.S.G._Ԁ "+ 2L1.1(b)(5).ThegovernmentsupportstherecommendationofU.S.Probationtoimposethe X- threelevelenhancement.ThisresponseissupportedbythefollowingMemorandumofPoints  ./ andAuthoritiesandincorporatesbyreferencetheUnitedStatesResponsetoDefendants d"1 ObjectiontoParagraph19ofthe_Presentence_ԀReport,filedJune15,2004. #:3 &    Respectfullysubmittedthis_____dayofJuly,2004. p% 5      (     0     PAULK.CHARLTON &F"7      (     0     UnitedStatesAttorney ' #8      (     0     DistrictofArizona |(#9      (     0     GARYM._RESTAINO_ *&<      (     0     AssistantU.S.Attorney'p%J  +&= /// -!)@  3q  8qXXdd8    _@{ { G MEMORANDUMOFPOINTSANDAUTHORITIES     DefendantarguesthatBlakelyv.Washington,2004WL1402697(2004),precludesthe 6 impositionofasentencingenhancementforconductwhichwasneitherchargednordetermined   byajurynoradmittedinthefactualbasisofapleaagreement.ThedecisioninBlakelycanbe B  distinguishedasaresultoftheadditionaladmissionsinthiscasebeyondthefactualbasisinthe   pleaagreement,andmayalsobedistinguishedbythefactorsusedtodeterminetheincreased N   sentence.  $   $(03"k"  k2  A  .3  0    Backgroundk݌Z && Ќ    UnitedStatesBorderPatrolagentsarresteddefendantonApril1,2004fortransporting 0  illegalaliensinaminivannearCoolidge,Arizona.Defendantconfesseduponarrest,and f  admittedinthefactualbasistotransportingmorethansixindividualssheknewtobealiens < unlawfullypresentintheUnitedStates.Defendantdidnotadmitthemannerinwhichshe r transportedthealiens,buttwoofthealiensgavestatementsasmaterialwitnessesdescribingthe H manneroftransport.Inparticular,ElizabethMartinezDominguezstatedthatthefirsttimeshe ~ metdefendant,onthedaybeforethearrest,defendanttoldhergrouptogetinavehicleandlay T down, sothattheywerentvisible.(Ex.A.)Thegovernmentanddefendantsubsequently  stipulatedthatmaterialwitnesstestimony shallbeadmittedassubstantiveevidenceinanytrial `  orhearingintheaboveencaptionedmatter.(Stipulation,filedApril9,2004at4.) " "&;"  &;0  2  1  .3  0&&  Thebasisfortheenhancement&;*݌ l$&& Ќ    Initsresponsetodefendantsoriginalobjection,thegovernmentrecommendedthatthis !& CourtimposetheenhancementunderU.S.S.G.2L1.1(b)(5)becausedefendantsvehiclehad (#x( noseatsandbecausethealienswerelyingdownonthefloor,andeachofthesefactscreatesa $* substantialriskofseriousbodilyinjurytothepassengers.Asathresholdmatter,thegovernment 4&!, urgesthisCourttofirstevaluatetheapplicabilityofthesentencingenhancementunderthe ' #. Guidelines,usingthefactssetforthanddiscussedintheoriginalobjectionandresponseand @)$0 withoutconsiderationofBlakely.IntheeventthatthisCourtdeterminesthattheevidencedoes *&2 notestablishthesubstantialriskofseriousbodilyinjury,itshouldsustaintheobjectionwithout L,'4 rulingonBlakely.ThisCourtneedonlyaddressBlakelyifitfirstdeterminesthattheevidence  justifiestheenhancement. 6   2.0  Theadditionaladmissionsbeyondthepleaagreement &&   UnderdefendantsreadingofBlakely,theonlyfactsadmissibleinasentencinghearing B  wouldbefactsadmittedbythedefendant.Inmostcases,thosefactsaresetforthonlyintheplea   agreement.Intheinstantcasethepartiesalsoenteredintoastipulationinlieuofvideo N   depositions.Takentogether,thepleaagreementandthestipulationprovidesufficientevidence  $  ofendangermentevenunderdefendantsreadingofBlakely. Z    Theonlyfactinthepleaagreementthattouchesonendangermentisdefendantsadmission 0  thatshetransported9passengersinaminivan,afactwhichmaylead,withadditionalevidence, f  tothelegalconclusionthatthevehiclewasovercrowdedandthereforeunsafe.Theadditional < evidencecomesfromthestipulation: r      ( ... H ! !"*ir"  *ir#0  0&&0( &&2(  3  )3  0 ( &( &  MaterialwitnessesEstebanHernandezGonzalezandElizabethMartinez ~ Dominguez,werefoundinavehicleoperatedbythedefendant,Teresa T CaballeroVelazquez;and*ir#=#݌ & & Ќ  "*ir"  *ir$0  0&&0( &&2(  4  )3  0 ( &( &  Thegovernmentmayelicithearsaytestimonyfromarrestingagents `  regardinganystatementsmadebytheabovereferencedmaterialwitnesses " containedinthedisclosure,andsuchtestimonyshallbeadmittedas  l$ substantiveevidenceinanyhearingortrialintheaboveencaptioned !& matter.*ir$%݌(#x( & & Ќ  (Stipulationat34.)ElizabethMartinezDomingueztoldagentsthatwhendefendantfirst $* transportedher,defendantdirectedhertolaydowninthevehicle.(Ex.A.)Thatfact,when 4&!, combinedwiththenumberofaliensfoundinthevehicleonthedayofthearrest,shouldjustify ' #. endangerment,provideditisafactuponwhichthisCourtmayrely. @)$0   Theupcomingsentencingofdefendantisahearingascontemplatedbythestipulation.The *&2 partiesdidnotmerelyagreethatthetestimonywouldbe admissibleintheory,butthatthe L,'4 testimonywouldactuallybeadmitted.Thestipulationthusformspartofthefactualbasis  admittedbythedefendantinthiscase,andisproperlyconsideredunderdefendantsreadingof 6 Blakely.    +(h80$! !"k"    k+2h  3  .3  0    ThescopeofBlakelyk++݌B && Ќ    DefendantsreadingofBlakelyinfersmorethantheCourtdetermined.Thedecisionin   BlakelydidnotaddresstheFederalSentencingGuidelines( theGuidelines). TheFederal N   Guidelinesarenotbeforeus,andweexpressnoopiniononthem.Blakely,2004WL1402697  $  at*6n.9.TheanalysisinBlakelymaynotbecomparabletoadeterminationofspecific Z  offensecharacteristicsofanadmittedcrimeunderChapter2oftheGuidelines. 0    TheCourtinBlakelystruckdownaWashingtonsentencingschemethatcontaineda f  presumptivestandardrangebasedontheoffenseitself,withan exceptionalsentencing < enhancementforfactorssuchas deliberatecruelty,providedthatthetrialcourtissueddetailed r findingsoffactandconclusionsoflawinsupport.Id.at*2.ThesefactorsintheWashington H schemearemostanalogoustotheaggravatingandmitigatingcircumstancesaddressedin18 ~ U.S.C.3553(b)andoutlinedinU.S.S.G.5K2.0.See,e.g.U.S.S.G.5K2.8(describingthe T  ExtremeConductenhancement).SimilartothedetailedfindingsoffactintheWashington  system,impositionoftheseChapter5enhancementsundertheGuidelinesrequiresacourttocite `   thespecificreasonfortheimpositionofasentencedifferentfromthatdescribed,whichreasons " alsomustbestatedwithspecificityinthewrittenorderofjudgmentandcommitment.18  l$ U.S.C.3553(c)(2).TotheextentthatBlakelyappliesdirectlytotheGuidelines,itappliesonly !& to departuresfromthepresumptiverange. (#x(   Inmarkedcontrast,impositionofasentencefor theapplicablecategoryofoffense $* committedbytheapplicablecategoryofdefendantdoesnotrequireacourttostatewith 4&!, specificityitsreasons,andrequiresonlyageneralrationalefortheplacementwithintherange. ' #. 18U.S.C.3553(a)(4)(A)and(c)(1).TheapplicablecategoryofoffenseissetforthinChapter @)$0 2oftheGuidelines,andincludesbothabaseoffenselevelandspecificoffensecharacteristics, *&2 andthegovernmentbasesitsrecommendationoftheendangermentenhancementonthose L,'4 specificoffensecharacteristics.Departuresoutsideaguidelinerangearedifferentfromspecific  offensecharacteristicswithinarange,andtheimpositionoftheenhancementforthe 6 characteristicsassociatedwithaliensmuggling,suchasnumberofaliensandendangerment,is   consistentwiththeCourtsdecisioninBlakely." ##  1      ׀ B   (88+! !"k"    k92  C  .3  0 (   Conclusionk99݌ ( &( & Ќ    Fortheforegoingreasons,thisCourtshouldadopttherecommendationinthePSRandfind N   thattheplacementofthealiensintheminivancreatedasubstantialriskofseriousbodilyinjury  $  tothepassengers. Z    Respectfullysubmittedthis_____dayofJuly,2004. 0       (     0     PAULK.CHARLTON f       (     0     UnitedStatesAttorney )y      (     0     DistrictofArizona <      (     0     GARYM.RESTAINO 5      (     0     AssistantU.S.Attorney H Copyoftheforegoingmailedthis ~ dateto: A rxGregBartolomei  AssistantFederalPublicDefender  KellyHeitkam `  U.S.Probation