« Another district court weighs in on Booker | Main | Will Booker come up during the State of the Union? »
January 31, 2005
Quick review of major post-Booker federal rulings
With the number of major post-Booker opinions starting to add up, I thought it would be a good time to assemble links to the significant rulings that have been discussed on the blog. Of course, as suggested by the newspaper reports on other federal sentencings collected here and here and here and here, the following list (which is in chronological order) is only the tip of the post-Booker iceberg:
Notable Booker rulings from the District Courts
- Judge Cassell's Wilson ruling (basics here, commentary here and here)
- Judge Adelman's Ranum ruling (basics here, commentary here and here)
- Judge Hornby's Jones ruling is here
- Judge Holmes' Barkley ruling (basics here, commentary here)
- Judge Pratt's Myers ruling is here
- Judge Sweet's West ruling is here
Notable Booker rulings from the Circuit Courts
- The 8th Circuit's Coffey ruling is here
- The 11th Circuit's Rubbo and Anderson rulings are here
- The 4th Circuit's Hughes ruling is here
- Notable unpublished rulings in Davis from the 6th Circuit and Tanner from the 9th Circuit are here
- The 11th Circuit's Reese ruling is here
- The 8th Circuit's Parsons ruling is here
I hope readers might use the comments to spotlight any notable opinions I have missed. And, of course, I suspect it won't take long this week for both of these lists to grow.
January 31, 2005 at 08:00 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d8346fef7269e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Quick review of major post-Booker federal rulings:
Comments
The Eighth Circuit just ruled in United States v. Fox that Booker applies to a case on direct review.
Here is the URL_ http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/8th/033554p.pdf
Posted by: Benicia Livorsi | Jan 31, 2005 3:11:37 PM
John, unless I am missing something, your 5th Circuit cite/link to Pinero concerns a pre-Booker ruling that has been effectively overruled by Booker.
Posted by: Doug B. | Jan 31, 2005 5:45:14 PM