« The 2d Circuit addresses more pipeline issues and the scope of the prior conviction exception | Main | High profile 2d Circuit Crosby remand »

April 27, 2005

Appeal waivers in the wake of Booker

Thanks to Appellate Law & Practice I see here that the Second Circuit today, in addition to its notable Fagans ruling (discussed here), issued a brief opinion on appeal waivers in US v. Morgan, No. 03-1316 (2d Cir. Apr. 27, 2005) (available here).  Morgan, in both outcome and approach, is similar to the Seventh Circuit's recent discussion of appeal waivers (per Judge Posner) in Bownes (available here).  Both decisions essentially say that defendants received benefits with the pre-Booker plea bargain that induced the waiver of appeal rights, and the legal change ushered in by Booker does not provide a legitimate basis for a defendant to now upset that bargain.

A number of weeks ago, I discussed at length in this post the law, policy and practice of appeal waivers in the wake of Booker.  Seeing the approach taken in Morgan and Bownes has me concerned that circuit courts are examining appeal waivers only from a defendant perspective and not from a system-wide perspective.  As explained in my prior post, whatever one thinks of claims that defendants should or should not be held to pre-Booker deals with appeal waivers, there is a separate argument, based in congressional-intent concepts and drawing on Justice Breyer's remedial work in Booker, that it is against public policy to let prosecutors and defendants completely opt-out of appellate review because Congress strongly favors the "retention of sentencing appeals ... to iron out sentencing difference," Booker, Breyer slip op. at 21.

As I suggested in my prior post, even if this public policy argument does not call for declaring appeal waivers unenforceable post-Booker, I think it does suggest that circuit courts should now at least review all appealed sentences for reasonableness (as the Eighth Circuit did in Killgo; details here).  And, again because of Justice Breyer's strong advocacy of congressional interest in appellate review, this public policy argument perhaps also suggests that district courts post-Booker should reconsider the appropriateness of accepting pleas with broad appeal waivers.

April 27, 2005 at 05:17 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Appeal waivers in the wake of Booker:


xxx maroc | audre ann nue | audre anne nue | audree rose nue | audreille nue | audrey cayla nue | audrey rose nue | audrey eliane nue | audreyxxx nue | audry nue | audryna nue | audryne nue | aulane nue | aunielle nue | auniere louange nue | aurane nue | aurelea nue | aurelee nue | aurelie karyanne nue | aurelie pishum nue | aurelie aisha nue | aurelie ertha nue | aurelie quy nue | aurelle nue | auriane nue | aurianne nue | aurilie nue | auristelle nue | aury ann nue | autumn nue | auxalie nue | auzalye nue | ava elisabeth nue | avan nue | avanna nue | averianne nue | avery grace nue | avesta nue | avia nue | avianna nue | aviva nue | avni nue | avril arianna nue | avril lucero nue | awa nue | axcel nue | axl nue | ayan nue | ayanda angel nue | ayanna nue | ayat nue | ayat arrahmane nue | ayeli nue | ayla katie nue | aylin nue | ayline nue | aymie nue | ayoka nue | ayse naide nue | aysenur nue | ayssa nue | azalea nue | azalie nue | azarie nue | aziel nue | azlynn nue | azul nue | azura maria nue | azya mikaela nue | azyanna nue | azza nue | azzurra nue | babyjane kaylee nue | bahia nue | bahijeh samira nue | baila nue | bailey nue | baily nue | balquis nue | bao nue | bao tran nue | baowa pierrette nue | baracha nue | barbara ann nue | baria nue | bashy nue | bassma nue | basya nue | batrou nue | batta nue

Posted by: Aaron | Nov 18, 2006 10:39:58 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB