« Another editorial against AG's proposed Booker fix | Main | More Booker fireworks from the Eighth Circuit »

July 5, 2005

Problems in Indiana with advisory fix

This morning brings this interesting AP story from Indiana concerning the state's decision to respond legislatively to Blakely issues by converting its mandatory sentencing system into an advisory system.  In the piece, Prof. Joel Schumm is quoted calling "the new law, which took effect in April, 'a pretty enormous setback' that undid decades of work toward making sentences fairer."  And:

The new law could expose judges to extreme pressure to impose harsher sentences in line with the wishes of victims and their families, Schumm said.  "To be honest with you, I think it could mean a lot more appeals and a lot longer sentences," he said.

The article also quotes lawyer Michael Ausbrook, of INCourts fame.  The piece is headlined "Sentencing law may increase appeals; Change is called 'enormous setback.'"  But for sentencing insiders who would understand the references, a more fitting title might be, "States should be wary of fixing Blakely with Booker."

July 5, 2005 at 10:03 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Problems in Indiana with advisory fix:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB