« Ninth Circuit (en banc) approves acquitted conduct enhancement | Main | Sentencing triple salchow from the Seventh Circuit »

February 10, 2006

Review of Booker's impact and white-collar sentencing

A helpful reader sent me to this article from the ABA Journal, which discusses the Jamie Olis resentencing and ways in which Booker and other factors are leading to a reconsideration of loss calculations in federal guideline sentencing.  Here are a few snippets from a good read:

Harsh prison terms for Olis and other corporate criminals are getting a second look, as is the guidelines' usefulness in cases where the amount lost drives up sentences almost to the exclusion of other factors... [B]usiness interests are complaining that in some instances white-collar punishments don't fit the crimes. And courts are beginning to listen.

Critics say the guidelines simply aren't up to the job of arriving at reasonable sentences because the extent of the loss often dwarfs other sentencing considerations that may favor leniency.  They also argue that the government provides unrealistic loss estimates that sometimes effectively lay all blame for major corporate wrongdoing at the feet of relatively minor defendants.

Related posts with more background on the Jamie Olis case:

February 10, 2006 at 04:18 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Review of Booker's impact and white-collar sentencing:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB