The federalization of the death penalty

The Wall Street Journal has this weekend piece on the increased application of the federal death penalty.  Here are snippets:

At a time when many states are backing away from capital punishment, the federal government is aggressively pursuing — and winning — more death sentences, including in jurisdictions that traditionally oppose them.... Today, there are 47 people on federal death row — more than double the number six years ago — and [seven come from] a state without a death statute of its own.... The ranks may grow in the months ahead, with several capital cases on tap in locales traditionally opposed to the death penalty....

The growth in federal capital cases, many observers say, results from a heightened effort by the Justice Department to centralize the process for deciding whether prosecutors should push for capital punishment.  Justice Department spokesman Erik Ablin says the government is making an effort to pursue capital punishment uniformly across the country. "We have in place a clearly defined review process to ensure the death penalty is applied in a consistent and fair manner nationwide," he said....

Since the 1988 reinstatement of the federal death penalty, prosecutors have attempted to bring capital cases in federal courts across the country.  Typically, this has proved much easier in states such as Texas, which have death penalties of their own, than in states such as Iowa, which don't. In 2000, there were 18 inmates on federal death row, but none were from a state that disallows capital punishment. 

Things began to change in 2002, when federal prosecutors secured a death sentence in Michigan, a state without a death penalty.  A year later, Mr. Ashcroft ordered U.S. attorneys in New York and Connecticut to seek death penalties against 12 defendants even though prosecutors handling the cases had recommended against doing so or decided not to pursue capital charges.  At the time, the Justice Department said there shouldn't be "one standard in Georgia and another in Vermont."

As explained in some posts listed below, I see many potential virtues in an expanded federal death penalty, including the possibility of emboldening states to gear down their (often ineffectual and inconsistent) use of the death penalty.

• A poster child for the (federal) death penalty?
• More support for an exclusively federal death penalty
• The federal law gap in the NJ death penalty report
• The federal death penalty in America's paradise
• Ashcroft's death penalty "legacy"