Should the Libby jury be told Scooter could be sentenced on acquitted counts?

As detailed here and here and here, the Libby jury concluded deliberations last week by asking a question about the meaning of reasonable doubt.  Though others are trying to read the tea leaves presented by the jury's question, I am thinking about whether the jury might be working on a split verdict on the five counts.  I am also wonder if folks think the jurors should be told that, even if they acquit on some counts, Libby could still be sentenced based on all the acquitted conduct if they come back with even a single conviction on the five counts.

Some related posts on Libby sentencing and on acquitted conduct:

• Pre-conviction speculation about possible sentencing term for Libby
• Could Libby's decision not to testify now result in an obstruction-of-justice enhancement?
• Sincere questions about acquitted conduct sentencing