« Examining what the Chief and Justice Ginsburg might do in Kennedy | Main | The loss-culpability connection (or disconnect) in white-collar sentencing »

April 30, 2008

Could an individually enforceable Second Amendment right impact debates over tort liability for guns?

200pxcatch22_cover The Second Circuit today issued a split opinion in City of New York v. Beretta, No. 05-6942 (2d Cir. April 30, 2008) (available here) concerning a civil suit against gun manufacturers.  Though the ruling is far afield from core sentencing issues, the decision returns me to my speculation that a pro-gun ruling in the Heller Second Amendment case could change not just the law, but also the politics, surrounding a variety of gun issues, including manufacturer liability. 

Notably, this issue came up during the Q&A in a presentation I gave a few nights ago as part of the wonderful Hoffinger Criminal Justice Colloquium at NYU School of Law.  That presentation, which I titled "The Second Amendment and the Plate Tectonics of Constitutional Criminal Law," developed some of the Second Amendment and sentencing themes I have developed in a number of prior posts.  I am not sure how this Beretta ruling fits into my thinking; it is notable that there is no Heller talk in the decision, though the dissent notably cites the Joseph Heller classic Catch-22.  Also notable are a variety of federal/state and civil/criminal issues developed in all the Beretta opinion.  I was stressing both the importance and volatility of these constitutional "fault lines" in my NYU talk.

Some related posts:

April 30, 2008 at 11:39 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Could an individually enforceable Second Amendment right impact debates over tort liability for guns?:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB