« "The cost of capital punishment" | Main | "Man shoots self, gets 33 months" »

April 15, 2009

Renewing a lawyerly pitch for ending drug prohibition

Thanks to this postat TalkLeft, I see that the New York City Bar Association's Committee on Drugs and the Law has issued this interesting five-page document titled "A Wiser Course: Ending Drug Prohibition, Fifteen Years Later."  Here are snippets from the start of the report:

In 1994, the New York City Bar Association’s Committee on Drugs and the Law concluded that the societal costs of drug prohibition are too high to justify it as a policy and called for a national dialogue on alternatives.  Fifteen years later, that dialogue has not occurred, we are no closer to a drug-free society, and the problems associated with the illegal drug trade are worse than ever....

On June 10, 1994, the Committee on Drugs and the Law (the “Committee”) of the New York City Bar Association released a report (the “Report”) entitled “A Wiser Course: Ending Drug Prohibition.” It is available at http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/94087WiserCourse.pdf

The Report argued in detail, inter alia, that drug prohibition strains the judicial system with no apparent diminution in drug trade or drug use, fills prisons at great expense to the taxpayers, disproportionately punishes racial minorities, corrupts police and erodes constitutional rights, subsidizes organized crime, drafts poor children into the drug trade, causes violence by engendering competition over the lucrative illegal drug market, fails to decrease demand for drugs, facilitates the spread of disease and impairs the health of drug users, and diverts resources from prevention and treatment to law enforcement.

In short, the Report argued that U.S. drug control policy is the cause of, rather than the solution for, many social problems associated with drugs, and it identified several alternatives to prohibition proposed by members of the federal judiciary (including repeal of all federal laws banning drug sales and possession in favor of state-level drug control, a policy of reduced arrests, and sale of drugs through state stores) without advocating any specific policy....

Today the Committee makes a renewed call for a serious discussion of U.S. drug policy through a focus on the medical paradigm and the Controlled Substances Act.

Some recent related posts:

April 15, 2009 at 12:17 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Renewing a lawyerly pitch for ending drug prohibition:


Do my eyes deceive me, or was a comment deleted?

Posted by: S.cotus | Apr 15, 2009 8:37:57 PM

Blogger prerogative... ;-)

Posted by: Doug B. | Apr 15, 2009 9:14:25 PM

So there actually is a bottom limit, below which a comment will be deleted. I had wondered.

Posted by: Kent Scheidegger | Apr 16, 2009 6:52:18 PM

That is correct. Berman tolerates no legal accusation of the criminal cult enterprise hierarchy, such as the Supreme Court, nor any proposal to arrest the cult criminals for crimes against humanity. This hierarchy is sacrosanct.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Apr 16, 2009 11:02:08 PM

How would ending drug prohibition effect crime?
I'm already biased on the subject, but i want to know how you feel.

Posted by: cialis online | Feb 5, 2010 4:00:14 PM

hi guys ... I was very pleased to read the information in this article ... was of great interest and would love to get a lot more information about "Watch the World(s)."

Posted by: Send flowers to poland | Jul 20, 2010 6:58:42 AM

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I think I will leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Posted by: Flowers store UK | Jul 22, 2010 6:22:08 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB