« "The cost of capital punishment" | Main | "Man shoots self, gets 33 months" »
April 15, 2009
Renewing a lawyerly pitch for ending drug prohibition
Thanks to this postat TalkLeft, I see that the New York City Bar Association's Committee on Drugs and the Law has issued this interesting five-page document titled "A Wiser Course: Ending Drug Prohibition, Fifteen Years Later." Here are snippets from the start of the report:
In 1994, the New York City Bar Association’s Committee on Drugs and the Law concluded that the societal costs of drug prohibition are too high to justify it as a policy and called for a national dialogue on alternatives. Fifteen years later, that dialogue has not occurred, we are no closer to a drug-free society, and the problems associated with the illegal drug trade are worse than ever....
On June 10, 1994, the Committee on Drugs and the Law (the “Committee”) of the New York City Bar Association released a report (the “Report”) entitled “A Wiser Course: Ending Drug Prohibition.” It is available at http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/94087WiserCourse.pdf
The Report argued in detail, inter alia, that drug prohibition strains the judicial system with no apparent diminution in drug trade or drug use, fills prisons at great expense to the taxpayers, disproportionately punishes racial minorities, corrupts police and erodes constitutional rights, subsidizes organized crime, drafts poor children into the drug trade, causes violence by engendering competition over the lucrative illegal drug market, fails to decrease demand for drugs, facilitates the spread of disease and impairs the health of drug users, and diverts resources from prevention and treatment to law enforcement.
In short, the Report argued that U.S. drug control policy is the cause of, rather than the solution for, many social problems associated with drugs, and it identified several alternatives to prohibition proposed by members of the federal judiciary (including repeal of all federal laws banning drug sales and possession in favor of state-level drug control, a policy of reduced arrests, and sale of drugs through state stores) without advocating any specific policy....
Today the Committee makes a renewed call for a serious discussion of U.S. drug policy through a focus on the medical paradigm and the Controlled Substances Act.
Some recent related posts:
- Thoughtful academic thoughts on ending marijuana prohibitions
- "Time For Marijuana Legalization?"
- Terrific commentary and assessment of the war on drugs
- More calls for an end to the drug war and legalization of marijuana
April 15, 2009 at 12:17 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201156f2a456d970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Renewing a lawyerly pitch for ending drug prohibition:
Comments
Do my eyes deceive me, or was a comment deleted?
Posted by: S.cotus | Apr 15, 2009 8:37:57 PM
Blogger prerogative... ;-)
Posted by: Doug B. | Apr 15, 2009 9:14:25 PM
So there actually is a bottom limit, below which a comment will be deleted. I had wondered.
Posted by: Kent Scheidegger | Apr 16, 2009 6:52:18 PM
That is correct. Berman tolerates no legal accusation of the criminal cult enterprise hierarchy, such as the Supreme Court, nor any proposal to arrest the cult criminals for crimes against humanity. This hierarchy is sacrosanct.
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Apr 16, 2009 11:02:08 PM
How would ending drug prohibition effect crime?
I'm already biased on the subject, but i want to know how you feel.
Posted by: cialis online | Feb 5, 2010 4:00:14 PM
hi guys ... I was very pleased to read the information in this article ... was of great interest and would love to get a lot more information about "Watch the World(s)."
Posted by: Send flowers to poland | Jul 20, 2010 6:58:42 AM
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I think I will leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Posted by: Flowers store UK | Jul 22, 2010 6:22:08 AM