« Letter to the USSC about modern sentencing data | Main | "Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?" »

April 30, 2009

Tenth Circuit rejects novel argument about crack retroactivity rules

The Tenth Circuit today in US v. Dryden, No. 08-3310 (10th Cir. April 30, 2009) (available here), rejects a defendant's novel effort to get the benefit of the new retroactive crack guidelines. Here is how it starts:

After the United States Sentencing Commission decided to give retroactive effect to its recent amendment to the crack-cocaine guidelines, Edward Dryden moved under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in his sentence.  The district court denied the motion, agreeing with the government that a reduction would be barred by the Commission’s policy statement in USSG § 1B1.10(a)(2) , because the amended guideline would not have reduced Mr. Dryden’s guideline sentencing range. Mr. Dryden appeals, raising the novel argument that the Commission’s policy statement results from an unconstitutional delegation to the Commission of legislative authority to restrict the jurisdiction of federal courts.  See Panama Ref. Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935).  Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

April 30, 2009 at 04:34 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tenth Circuit rejects novel argument about crack retroactivity rules:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB