« Washington Post editorial argues against completely eliminating crack/powder sentencing disparity | Main | Must-read posts from Kleiman on having less crime and less punishment »

October 29, 2009

"On the Limits of Supremacy: Medical Marijuana and the States’ Overlooked Power to Legalize Federal Crime"

The title of this post is the title of this timely new article by Professor Robert Mikos in the latest issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review.  Here is the abstract:

Using the conflict over medical marijuana as a timely case study, this Article explores the overlooked and underappreciated power of states to legalize conduct Congress bans.  Though Congress has banned marijuana outright, and though that ban has survived constitutional scrutiny, state laws legalizing medical use of marijuana not only survive careful preemption analysis, they constitute the de facto governing law in thirteen states.  This Article argues that these state laws and most related regulations have not been and, more interestingly, cannot be preempted by Congress, given constraints imposed on Congress’s preemption power by the anti-commandeering rule, properly understood.  The Article develops a new framework for analyzing the boundary between permissible preemption and prohibited commandeering — the state-of-nature benchmark. The state-of-nature benchmark eliminates much of the confusion that has clouded disputes over the legal status of state medical marijuana laws.

Just as importantly, the Article demonstrates why these state laws matter in a more practical sense.  By legalizing medical use of marijuana under state law, states have removed the most significant barriers inhibiting the practice, including not only state legal sanctions but also the personal, moral, and social disapproval that once discouraged medicinal uses of the drug.  As a result, medical use of marijuana has survived and indeed thrived in the shadow of the federal ban.  The war over medical marijuana may be largely over, as commentators suggest, but contrary to conventional wisdom it is the states, and not the federal government, that have emerged the victors in this struggle.  Although the Article focuses on medical marijuana, the framework developed herein could be applied to any issue pitting permissive state laws against harsh federal bans, including abortion, sports gambling, and firearms possession.

October 29, 2009 at 09:39 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "On the Limits of Supremacy: Medical Marijuana and the States’ Overlooked Power to Legalize Federal Crime":


interesting Article...I have learnt a lot of new and useful to myself...Thanks

Posted by: anny | Jun 18, 2010 7:01:45 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB