« Federal ruling seems to push California toward one-drug execution protocol | Main | Latest poll suggests positive buzz surrounding California's marijuana legalization proposition »

September 25, 2010

Taking stock of fraud law and cases impacted by the SCOTUS Skilling ruling

Today's Wall Street Journal includes this effective article headlined "Fraud Cases Get Rehashed After Court Ruling." Here are excerpts:

Federal lawmakers and Justice Department officials are weighing new legislation to salvage a fraud statute used to pursue corporate and public corruption, as prosecutors grapple with the fallout of a Supreme Court ruling that weakened the law.

The court's decision in June to limit prosecutions for honest-services fraud has affected cases against high-profile defendants such as former Enron Chief Executive Jeffrey Skilling, whose appeal was the basis for the ruling, and lesser-known ones such as Edward J. Price III, the former mayor of Mandeville, La.

The law, making it a crime to deprive someone of the "intangible right of honest services," has long been used to prosecute officials or executives accused of placing their interests above those of taxpayers or shareholders. Defense lawyers criticized it as unconstitutionally vague.

Mr. Price cut a deal with prosecutors to shave two years off the 64-month prison term he received a week before the Supreme Court ruling invalidated part of his guilty plea. He admitted taking golf trips to Pebble Beach, Calif., paid for by a developer and the city engineer. A judge is to impose a new sentence Wednesday. "It's the first time in 38 or 39 years that I've done this sort of thing in federal court," said Mr. Price's lawyer, Ralph S. Whalen Jr. Louisiana prosecutors declined to comment.

The Supreme Court said the law clearly criminalized bribery and kickbacks, but was too vague to continue to be used against undisclosed conflicts of interest, where the evidence of corruption is more subtle.  Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department's criminal division, is expected to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday on the ruling's impact.

Justice Department officials and congressional staff are discussing how to close what they believe is a legal hole left by the high court, people familiar with the matter say.  Sen. Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.), the Judiciary Committee chairman, said Friday, "whole categories of corrupt and fraudulent conduct could go unpunished" because of the ruling. He said he was working with colleagues "to determine how best to clarify and restore this statute."...

[T]he ruling appears to have deterred prosecutors from bringing charges they would have brought before.  An analysis of federal prosecutions across the U.S. shows that pattern began even before the ruling, as the government and defense lawyers likely began to anticipate it.

In 2008 and 2009, the government brought honest-services fraud charges in more than 100 cases a year, the analysis shows.  The pace slowed in the second half of last year, after the Supreme Court agreed to review three cases, including Mr. Skilling's and former media mogul Conrad Black's. This year, new prosecutions using the statute slowed to a trickle....

So far, only a few cases have been totally upended. A New Jersey judge tossed out the conviction of Joseph Ferriero, the former Bergen County Democratic chairman; prosecutors haven't said whether they would seek a new indictment in the case. Prosecutors in Kansas dropped charges against Westar Energy executives.

Among the big-name defendants seeking to revisit cases are former Illinois Gov. George Ryan, ex-Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman, former HealthSouth chief Richard Scrushy, ex-New York Senate leader Joseph Bruno, and plaintiffs' lawyer Zach Scruggs. Mr. Black, released from prison pending a review of his conviction, is scheduled for a hearing in Chicago Wednesday.

September 25, 2010 at 01:19 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Taking stock of fraud law and cases impacted by the SCOTUS Skilling ruling:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB