« Some notable execution news and notes (outside Virginia) | Main | Lindsay Lohan saga continues, as she is hauled off to jail again »

September 24, 2010

"Why Parents Should Support Legalizing Pot"

The title of this post is the headline of this notable commentary at AlterNet by Hanna Liebman Dershowitz, a lawyer in California who is co-chair of the Proposition 19 legal subcommittee. Here are excerpts:

My son just started kindergarten. So naturally, I have been thinking a lot about the type of world and community in which I want him and our seven-year-old daughter to live.  I am involved in a project to improve school lunches in our district to reinforce the nutrition lessons we teach in our home.  I am a founding board member of a community group trying to improve our city’s parks.  And I am working to help pass Proposition 19, the initiative to control and tax marijuana in California. It is important to me as a mother that my children grow up in a state —- hopefully a country soon —- that rejects the ineffective and damaging policy of marijuana prohibition.  It may be counterintuitive, but legalizing marijuana will be better and safer for our children.

I would like to believe my kids won’t ever choose to use drugs.  But whatever happens, it is certain that prohibition does not stop kids from using marijuana, and that my kids will be exposed to it along with other risky behaviors.  After all, about a third of high school seniors have used marijuana within the last year, a figure that has been relatively stable over decades across the country and has not been affected by variations in laws and enforcement.  Moreover, it has long been easier for kids to get marijuana than it is for them to get alcohol.  The plain fact is drug dealers don’t require ID, and legitimate businesses do.  By taking marijuana out of the black market and placing it within the confines of safe, regulated, and licensed businesses that only sell to those 21 and over, Proposition 19 would actually reduce underage access to marijuana.

While we don’t want our kids to try marijuana, if they do later on it can lead to very harsh consequences if they are caught, even for actions that are not harmful to others.  And this next part is really scary: when a person is convicted of a marijuana offense, he or she is precluded from receiving federal student loans, will forever have a drug record that diminishes job prospects, and is precluded from many other benefits, not to mention being arrested, possibly serving time, and other harsh and harrowing outcomes. We don’t prevent even violent criminals from getting student loans. Or underage drinkers, for that matter....

To truly serve public safety, we should control and tax marijuana, since under present policies, thousands of violent crimes go unsolved, while police spend valuable and scarce resources targeting thousands of non-violent adult marijuana users.  Arrests for simple possession of marijuana have tripled over the last two decades. The $300 million California spends each year on marijuana enforcement would better serve our communities spent on solving and preventing violent crimes. Any new tax revenues would better serve our children if spent on drug education, drug rehabilitation, and of course shoring up our crumbling public education system....

We know our children are going to make decisions for themselves, probably at an age we think is too young.  Laws are not going to be nearly as effective in guiding those choices as the messages we send to them as parents and in our public education efforts. We need to help kids navigate into adulthood with the judgment to moderate their intake of so many substances capable of abuse — from sugar to caffeine, alcohol, prescription drugs, and, yes, marijuana. Not to mention making good decisions about sex, Internet usage, driving, studying, and extracurricular activities.  As a mother, thinking through the list, I am not most terrified by the choices they might make regarding marijuana.... As parents, we know that education is often more effective than punishment, and in some cases punishment is not effective at all.

Women were instrumental in bringing about repeal of Prohibition in 1933, and we can be again when it comes to determining when marijuana prohibition is reversed. In my view, Proposition 19 is the right choice —- not just for true law and order —- but for our kids.

September 24, 2010 at 03:58 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Why Parents Should Support Legalizing Pot":


Bill Ottis must think she's a "druggie" or just wants to secretly "get stoned."

Posted by: Anon | Sep 24, 2010 5:08:07 PM

The lawyer dumbass has it legal to use two substances that kill 500,000 people a year and take up more than a third of the health budget. A substance that kills a few dozen intoxicated drivers, that is prohibited. This prohibition is the pretext to transfer $trillions from hard working citizens, including female ones, to lazy, worthless government workers in their sinecures.

I have patience. When the public has had enough, I will have drafted the Amendment and the statutes that will put the lawyer dumbass in his place and will end the oppression, incompetence, and sheer, lawless stupidity. The lawyer may have an IQ of 300, but then comes in contact with the indoctrination of the criminal cult enterprise. Now, he is retard, with less judgment and knowledge than student in Life Skills class, where the safe use of utensils and personal hygiene have to be reviewed for years at a time.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Sep 24, 2010 8:28:26 PM

Anon --

What I actually think -- not that you asked -- is that this woman packs more mush-mouthed liberal platitudes into one paragraph than anyone since Lindsay Lohan's lawyer.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Sep 24, 2010 10:51:34 PM

Protect the children...and if they won't behave - lock'em up and throw away the key! Hmmm, yes well - never mind.

Posted by: Throsso | Sep 26, 2010 3:06:11 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB