« Early assessments of SCOTUS oral argument in California prison overcrowding case | Main | An innocence-based pitch for California capital clemency for Kevin Cooper »

December 1, 2010

"Veterans’ Courts and Criminal Responsibility: A Problem Solving History & Approach to the Liminality of Combat Trauma"

The title of this post is the title of this interesting book chapter by Professor Justin Holbrook. Here is the abstract:

In September 2010, a federal judge dismissed a criminal case involving a veteran accused of assaulting a federal police officer to allow the case to be heard by the Buffalo Veterans Treatment Court, a division of Buffalo City Court.  For those involved in veterans’ advocacy and treatment, the case is significant for a number of reasons.

First, it is the first criminal case nationwide to be transferred from federal court to a local veterans treatment court where the goal is to treat — rather than simply punish — those facing the liminal effects of military combat.  Second, the case reignites the still unsettled controversy over whether problem-solving courts generally, and veterans courts specifically, unfairly shift the focus of justice away from the retributive interests of victims to the rehabilitative interests of perpetrators.  Third, the case serves as a signal reminder to all justice system stakeholders, including parties, judges, attorneys, and treatment professionals, of the potential benefits of sidestepping courtroom adversity in favor of a coordinated effort that seeks to ameliorate victim concerns while advancing treatment opportunities for veterans suffering from combat-related trauma.  This chapter explores these issues in light of the history of combat-related trauma and the development of veterans’ treatment courts around the country.

December 1, 2010 at 09:54 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Veterans’ Courts and Criminal Responsibility: A Problem Solving History & Approach to the Liminality of Combat Trauma" :


Again. What a deeply offensive insult to veterans of all theaters. The court implies, being a veteran gives one a special disability, with diminished responsibility, as if war causes criminality. It does the opposite. It suppresses criminality. This is thinly veiled Bush bashing. See what Bush made the veteran do with his war. As a group, military veterans have superior function, tougher hides, greater experience and maturity, and less desire to hurt people than others.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Dec 2, 2010 12:06:53 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB