« "Willie Nelson Could Sing for His Freedom in Texas Pot Case" | Main | Tenth Circuit rejects interesting attack on BOP policy concerning RDAP early release »

March 30, 2011

"Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment"

The title of this post is the title of this new paper by Jennifer Skeem and John Monahan, which is now available via SSRN. Here is the abstract:

A variety of instruments have been published over recent years that improve clinicians’ ability to forecast the likelihood that an individual will behave violently.  Increasingly, these instruments are being applied in response to laws that require specialized risk assessments.  In this article, we present a framework that goes beyond the "clinical" and "actuarial" dichotomy to describe a continuum of structured approaches to risk assessment.  Despite differences among them, there is little evidence that one validated instrument predicts violence better than another.  We believe that these group-based instruments are useful for assessing an individual’s risk, and that an instrument should be chosen based on an evaluation’s purpose (i.e., risk assessment vs. risk reduction).  The time is ripe to shift attention from predicting violence to understanding its causes and preventing its (re)occurrence.

March 30, 2011 at 08:36 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment":


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB