« Justice Department creates great new evidence-based criminal justice resource | Main | Judge Davis laments drug war's damage and costs in concurrence requiring LWOP for druggie »

June 22, 2011

DPIC releases new anti-DP report on 35th anniversary of Gregg ruling

Sblcover The Death Penalty Information Center has just released this big new report on the state of capital punishment in the US.  The report is titled "Struck By Lightning: The Continuing Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty Thirty-Five Years After Its Re-instatement in 1976," and it seems to cover all of the modern hot topics surrounding the administration of the death penalty.  Here is the report's executive summary:

The United States Supreme Court approved the re-instatement of the death penalty 35 years ago on July 2, 1976.  Although the death penalty had earlier been held unconstitutional because of its arbitrary and unpredictable application, the Court was willing to sanction new systems that states had proposed to make capital punishment less like “being struck by lightning” and more like retribution for only the “worst of the worst” offenders.  The Court also deferred to the statesʼ judgment that the death penalty served the goals of retribution and deterrence.

After three and a half decades of experience under these revised statutes, the randomness of the system continues.  Many of the countryʼs constitutional experts and prominent legal organizations have concluded that effective reform is impossible and the practice should be ended.  In polls, jury verdicts and state legislative action, there is evidence of the American peopleʼs growing frustration with the death penalty.  A majority of the nine Justices who served on the Supreme Court in 1976 when the death penalty was approved eventually concluded the experiment had failed.

Four states have abolished the death penalty in the past four years, and nationwide executions and death sentences have been cut in half since 2000.  A review of state death penalty practices exposes a system in which an unpredictable few cases result in executions from among thousands of eligible cases.  Race, geography and the size of a countyʼs budget play a major role in who receives the ultimate punishment.  Many cases thought to embody the worst crimes and defendants are overturned on appeal and then assessed very differently the second time around at retrial.  Even these reversals depend significantly on the quality of the lawyers assigned and on who appointed the appellate judges reviewing the cases.  In such a haphazard process, the rationales of deterrence and retribution make little sense.

In 1976, the newly reformed death penalty was allowed to resume.  However, it has proved unworkable in practice. Keeping it in place, or attempting still more reform, would be enormously expensive, with little chance of improvement.  The constitution requires fairness not just in lofty words, but also in daily practice.  On that score, the death penalty has missed the mark.

June 22, 2011 at 10:43 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DPIC releases new anti-DP report on 35th anniversary of Gregg ruling:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB