« Effective discussion of Apprendi's application to corporate fines | Main | Why shouldn't Georgia lethal injection — and all executions — be recorded on video? »

July 21, 2011

"Do Sentencing Enhancements for Drunk Driving Decrease Recidivism? a Regression Discontinuity Approach"

The title of this post is the title of this new empirical paper by Miguel De Figueiredo, which has this abstract:

Using micro-level data on drunk driving arrests in Arkansas, this paper exploits discontinuities in sentencing enhancements at various blood alcohol content (BAC) levels to estimate causally the effect of the increasing penalties on recidivism.  Specifically, the research design examines defendants just above and just below a BAC level of 0.15 to see if the effect of an increased license suspension by an additional two months has an effect on recidivism.

The paper finds that increased penalties in the neighborhood of the discontinuity in the form of license suspensions have no statistically significant effect on drunk driving recidivism, suggesting that the increased penalty does not deter defendants from committing another drunk driving offense in the future.  The paper’s focus on suspension of privileges as a form of punishment, coupled with its rich micro-level data (15,973 defendants from two jurisdictions) and research design that enables reliable causal inferences and estimation, make it contrast with numerous studies in the extant literature.

July 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Do Sentencing Enhancements for Drunk Driving Decrease Recidivism? a Regression Discontinuity Approach":


This matter is downcast to earth, hats off buds out there.

Posted by: dui defense | Nov 16, 2012 7:45:16 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB