« Two SCOTUS summary reversals: a notable sex-offender monitoring issue and another AEDPA enforcement | Main | "Monitoring Youth: The Collision of Rights and Rehabilitation" »
March 30, 2015
California and Ohio facing capital congestion without a functioning execution chamber
Theses two local stories concerning death row realities in two states strike a similar note:
From California here, "California's death row, with no executions in sight, runs out of room." This story starts this way:
With no executions in nearly a decade and newly condemned men arriving each month, the nation's largest death row has run out of room. Warning that there is little time to lose, Gov. Jerry Brown is asking the California Legislature for $3.2 million to open nearly 100 more cells for condemned men at San Quentin State Prison. The proposed expansion would take advantage of cells made available as the state releases low-level drug offenders and thieves under a new law voters approved last year.
California's death penalty has been the subject of a decade of litigation. One case led to a halt to executions in 2006. Another resulted in a federal judge's ruling last July that the state's interminably slow capital appeals system is unconstitutionally cruel. Through it all, the death row population has grown from 646 in 2006 to 751 today.
From Ohio here, "Backup of killers awaiting execution is building." This story starts this way:
Midway through Ohio’s two-year death penalty moratorium, a backup of men awaiting execution is building. There are 20 inmates either scheduled for execution or for whom prosecutors are seeking execution dates from the Ohio Supreme Court, according to the Capital Crimes Annual Report released today by Attorney General Mike DeWine. [The report also indicates 145 murderers are on Ohio's death row now.]
Especially because no state other than Texas ever shown a consistent ability to conduct more than 10 executions in any given year, these data necessarily mean many years (and likely many decades) will be needed to actually carry out a significant number of imposed capital punishments in these states when (if?) these states get their death machineries operating again.
March 30, 2015 at 02:43 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201b7c76eaf4d970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference California and Ohio facing capital congestion without a functioning execution chamber:
Comments
California has a fundamental problem in that juries and trial courts are willing to impose the death penalty but higher courts and the executive branch are unwilling to take the steps to carry out that sentence in a timely fashion. California would need death rows at multiple prisons to begin making a dent in its backlog (and probably would need to manufacture its own chemicals or go to some method other than lethal injection).
Ohio's backlog seems manageable if they can re-start the process soon (probably about three to four years to get current).
Posted by: tmm | Mar 31, 2015 2:32:58 PM