« Three Justices lament SCOTUS failure to do death-penalty error correction in Texas case | Main | Why passage of Prop 47 ensures California remains a hot topic in sentencing and corrections reform »
March 23, 2015
Did serial rapist, former NFL star Darren Sharper, benefit from celebrity justice in global plea deal?
The provocative question in the title of this post is prompted by the notable celebrity sentencing news breaking today and reported in this extended USA Today article headlined "Darren Sharper sentenced to nine years in first of plea deals." Here are the details:
Former NFL star Darren Sharper was sentenced to nine years in prison Monday in Arizona after pleading guilty to sexual assault and attempted sexual assault in November 2013, the Maricopa County Attorney's office confirmed to USA TODAY Sports.
Sharper, 39, entered his pleas Monday in Arizona from Los Angeles, where he was expected to appear in court later in the day and enter a guilty plea in connection with two other rape allegations from 2013 and 2014.
The pleas are part of an attempted "global" plea agreement that could resolve all nine rape charges against him in four states. In addition to the charges in California and Arizona, he faces two rape charges in Las Vegas and three in New Orleans, where is expected to enter guilty pleas within the next month.
The sentences will run concurrently in federal prison, said Jerry Cobb of the Maricopa County Attorney's office. Sharper is not eligible for early release in Arizona, but will be credited for time served in Los Angeles, where he has been in jail without bail since Feb. 27, 2014.
By agreeing to the plea deal, Sharper, 39, avoids the risk of receiving an even worse punishment in the future and expensive litigation that could drag on indefinitely in four states. If convicted, he faced life in prison in Louisiana and more than 30 years in Los Angeles. For prosecutors, the plea deal avoids the risk of going to trial, where juries might be influenced by Sharper's fame and celebrity defense attorneys.
His suspected string of serial rapes ended in January 2014, when he was arrested on a suspicion of rape in Los Angeles. At the time of his first arrest, he had 20 zolpidem pills in his possession – a sleep drug known by its brand name Ambien. Sharper obtained a prescription for the drug after suffering sleep problems he attributed to his 14-year career in the NFL with the New Orleans Saints, Green Bay Packers and Minnesota Vikings, according to a workers compensation claim form he filed in 2012.
The drug can be slipped into drinks to knock out women and rape them, and that's what authorities say Sharper did time after time, according to court records. Sharper ultimately was charged with nine rapes in four states, including three in consecutive nights in two different states in January 2014.
None of the cases went to trial or even received an evidentiary hearing except in Arizona, where a judge ruled last April there was "proof evident" Sharper raped a women there in November 2013. DNA found inside the women's body partially matched Sharper's, and a witness reported waking up and seeing Sharper naked and making thrusting movements over the woman, according to a detective's testimony at the hearing.
The detective said the woman hadn't known Sharper before that night and didn't remember what happened to her after consuming a drink Sharper made her. Zolpidem was found in the cup in subsequent tests. Though Sharper's attorney noted that none of Sharper's sperm was found on the alleged victims in Arizona, the detective said he was told that Sharper had a vasectomy, which could explain the lack of sperm. The revelation caused a stir that day in Arizona, where Sharper was charged with drugging three women and raping two of them.
In Los Angeles, he was charged with drugging and raping two women – one in October 2013 and one in January 2014. In the first one, Sharper met two women at a club in West Hollywood and later invited them to his hotel room, where he offered them a drink, according to a police report of the incident filed in court....
In New Orleans, Sharper was accused of drugging and raping two women in September 2013. He also faced federal drug charges and another rape charge from Aug. 31, 2013, all of it happening just a few years after he helped the Saints win a Super Bowl in 2010.
Though the evidence against Sharper has not, obviously, been proven in court, this press account and his global plea leads me to think he truly is guilty of nine rapes. And assuming that is true, a year in prison for each of nine rapes is a pretty sweet plea deal. Ergo the question in the title of this post.
March 23, 2015 at 04:04 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201bb080d8650970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Did serial rapist, former NFL star Darren Sharper, benefit from celebrity justice in global plea deal?:
Comments
“Sweet” is an understatement •
Posted by: Docile Jim Brady @Bend, OR 97702-3212 | Mar 23, 2015 7:23:33 PM
The Supremacy does not understand this criminal. He is young, good looking, famous, rich, buffed, likely well endowed. Women are probably accosting him everywhere. If awake they probably get very excited by the features just listed. Once, a woman has come to your room, she is likely very interested. If you wait a few minutes and are too slow, she will likely jump on you, and do that whole Body Heat thing.
What is the pleasure of having consort with a person who is asleep and not moving? I have heard of necrophilia (attraction to the deceased). I have never heard of somniphilia (attraction to the sleeping).
Ambien is not anesthesia, and lasts only a short time. So he should have tested it on himself. He would find it unreliable, if sleeping people are his thing. (If they are his thing, that is likely an involuntary sexual preference, and may be protected by the anti-discrimination laws protecting people with far more deviant sexual preferences.) If he prefers the sleeping, that preference is likely life long. He should thus receive an indeterminate sentence for the protection of the public.
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Mar 24, 2015 11:19:27 AM
Is somiphilia relevant to the Bill Cosby matter?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/03/bill-cosby-patricia_n_6792516.html
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Mar 24, 2015 11:25:40 AM