« Oregon Supreme Court to consider constitutionality of LWOP sentence for public pubic promotion | Main | Previewing the little SCOTUS capital case examining what procedure Atkins may require »

March 29, 2015

Local Tennessee prosecutors pushed for female sterilization in plea discussions

A helpful reader alerted me to this stunning AP article about a stunning aspect of what some local prosecutors sometimes incorporated into plea discussion with female defendants in Tennessee.  The piece is headlined "Attorneys: Sterilizations were part of plea deal talks," and here are some of the details:

Nashville prosecutors have made sterilization of women part of plea negotiations at least four times in the past five years, and the district attorney has banned his staff from using the invasive surgery as a bargaining chip after the latest case.

In the most recent case, first reported by The Tennessean, a woman with a 20-year history of mental illness had been charged with neglect after her 5-day-old baby mysteriously died. Her defense attorney says the prosecutor assigned to the case wouldn't go forward with a plea deal to keep the woman out of prison unless she had the surgery.

Defense attorneys say there have been at least three similar cases in the past five years, suggesting the practice may not be as rare as people think and may happen more often outside the public view and without the blessing of a court .

Sterilization coerced by the legal system evokes a dark time in America, when minorities, the poor and those deemed mentally unfit or "deficient" were forced to undergo medical procedures that prevented them from having children.

"The history of sterilization in this country is that it is applied to the most despised people — criminals and the people we're most afraid of, the mentally ill — and the one thing that that these two groups usually share is that they are the most poor. That is what we've done in the past, and that's a good reason not to do it now," said Paul Lombardo, a law professor and historian who teaches at Georgia State University.

Davidson County District Attorney Glenn Funk agrees. A former defense attorney who took over the office in September, he recently ordered lawyers in his office not to seek sterilization by defendants. He said he hadn't heard of it happening before but didn't ask. Funk said people could be ordered to stay away from children, and the state wouldn't have to resort to such invasive measures. "The bottom line is the government can't be ordering a forced sterilization," Funk said.

However, such deals do happen.

In West Virginia, a 21-year-old unmarried mother of three agreed to have her tubes tied in 2009 as part of her probation after she pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute marijuana. And last year, a Virginia man who fathered children with several women agreed to undergo a vasectomy in exchange for less prison time in a child endangerment case.

Forced sterilization came up in a different way in California last year, when Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill that banned state prisons from forcing female inmates to be sterilized. The law was pushed through after the Center for Investigative Reporting found that nearly 150 female prisoners had been sterilized between 2006 and 2010. An audit found that the state failed to make sure the inmate's consent was lawfully obtained in every case ....

The assistant district attorney who worked the [most recent] case, Brian Holmgren, is a child prosecutor who speaks around the country, was once a senior attorney with the National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse and serves on the international advisory board of the National Center for Shaken Baby Syndrome. He has been both praised and fiercely criticized for his aggressive courtroom tactics on behalf of children.... Holmgren did not respond to several messages seeking comment.

Nashville defense attorney Carrie Searcy said Holmgren asked that two of her clients who gave birth to children who tested positive for drugs undergo sterilization. Neither did, Searcy said, because both women had already undergone the procedure.

Assistant public defender Joan Lawson, who also supervises other attorneys, said she also had been involved in cases in which a prosecutor had put sterilization on the table. Lawson said it was typically not an explicit demand, was not an everyday occurrence and was made off the record. Lawson said she refused the idea and resolved her cases without sterilization. "It's always been more of 'If your client is willing to do this, then I might be inclined to talk about probation,'" Lawson said.

March 29, 2015 at 12:41 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201b7c76de7ac970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Local Tennessee prosecutors pushed for female sterilization in plea discussions:

Comments

The Supremacy has proposed the Lower Fecundity Theory of low crime rates despite every effort of the pro-criminal lawyer to increase it. This is where the ultra-violent predators incarcerated in Incarceration Nation do not reproduce with crack whores to produce more super-predators, because they are in a cage. Thus the crime rate will spike in 15-20 years as all the predators are released by the pro criminal lawyer to go forth and reproduce.

Is there any substantive difference between a low fecundity by surgery and being free on the outside or a low fecundity by being locked in a cage? Which would be more palatable to an ordinary person?

The most stunning aspect of this question is not sterilization. It is why the lawyer traitor wants to explode the crime rate again for a few lousy government make work jobs. The pro-criminal lawyer is a disgusting human being.

The outrage of the pro-criminal lawyer stems from the prospect of losing future government make work jobs. These are totally worthless to the tax payer, being filled by pro-criminal lawyers.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Mar 29, 2015 8:15:48 PM

Your post is making less sense by the day and sounding trollish SC,even if its sarcasm, writing skill could be better. The fact is indigent defense is often under-paid,over-worked,and even paying a secretary to answer calls makes margins slimmer. Prosecutors who often have better resources and funding and are paid in many cases double indigent defense lawyers are not being scrutinized by your post. For every defense lawyer there needs to be a prosecutor right to be charged with a crime, so the pro-prosecution lawyer is a disgusting human being, in fact every 1 for 2 defense lawyers.

Posted by: Alex | Mar 30, 2015 12:56:45 AM

While I can at least see some relation between sterilization and the mentally ill woman with the dead newborn I am at a complete loss trying to come up with an explanation for tying such a procedure to a drug possession case. I suppose I could see such a link if the woman were pushing the drugs on her own kids but even generally neglectful parenting (say she were ignoring the kids because she was high) does not rise to a level where I see such an outcome being warranted.

Posted by: Soronel Haetir | Mar 30, 2015 2:09:36 AM

In Reckless Hands: Skinner v. Oklahoma and the Near-Triumph of American Eugenics

Posted by: George | Mar 30, 2015 2:40:49 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB