« "The Executioners' Dilemmas" | Main | Are compounding pharmacies likely to cut off drug dealing to states for executions? »
March 25, 2015
You be the judge: what federal sentence for modern sheriff playing Robin Hood?
In the legend of Robin Hood, the Sheriff of Nottingham is the tale's primary villain. But this sentencing story out of South Carolina raises the question of what federal sentence ought to be given to a local sheriff who was committing fraud as a kind of modern Robin Hood. The press report is headlined "Convicted Williamsburg sheriff asks for sentencing leniency," and here are the details:
The convicted former sheriff of Williamsburg County should be sentenced to less than the three years in prison recommended by federal officials because he succeeded despite a troubled upbringing and is being treated for a painkiller addiction, his lawyer said.
Ex-sheriff Michael Johnson faces a judge Wednesday to learn his fate after a federal jury convicted him in September of mail fraud. Prosecutors said Johnson created hundreds of fake police reports for a friend who ran a credit repair business so people could claim their identities were stolen and get out of credit card debt. The sentencing recommendation for Johnson is 30 months to 37 months in prison, according to court papers filed this week.
Johnson's attorney said that is too harsh for a man with no criminal record who cooperated with authorities. Johnson's request asks for a lesser sentence, but is not specific. Johnson has suffered from depression and anxiety the past four years. He also has migraines, high blood pressure and insomnia, lawyer Deborah Barber said in court papers.
The former sheriff also was raised in a broken home, saw his mother abused by a boyfriend and left at age 17 to relieve her of financial burden, Barber said. "He resided in a poverty-stricken area in Kingstree, South Carolina, with the family not having enough money to adequately survive," Barber wrote....
Johnson joined the Williamsburg County Sheriff's Office in 1997, two years after graduating high school and rose to chief deputy, becoming sheriff in April 2010 when the former sheriff, Kelvin Washington, was named U.S. Marshal for South Carolina.
He is one of nine sheriffs in South Carolina's 46 counties to be charged or investigated while in office since 2010. Seven have pleaded guilty or been convicted, and another died while under investigation. Only two of those sheriffs so far have been sentenced to prison.
Intriguingly, this long earlier article explains some of the details of the fraud, and it suggests that sheriff Johnson may not have made any money from the scheme designed to help people to (falsely) improve their credit rating. I am disinclined to assert that sheriff Johnson is as noble or heroic as Robin Hood, but it does seem like his fraud involved trying to help some folks down on their luck by pulling a fast one on the (big bad monarchy?) credit companies. Given that the federal sentencing guidelines still call for a prison term of at least 2.5 years, I am now wondering what the real Robin Hood might have been facing in a federal fraud guideline range if he were facing sentencing today.
March 25, 2015 at 09:01 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201b8d0f477d9970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference You be the judge: what federal sentence for modern sheriff playing Robin Hood?:
Comments
If he didn't profit at all, I certainly think that's a relevant consideration for a reduction in the guidelines. I'm not that well versed in federal guidelines, but I imagine they take into account the amount of financial loss? If so, I think the lack of personal gain could be significant (because I'd imagine the guidelines assume you benefited in some way). On the other hand, I'd like to know whether the guidelines take into account the abuse of his position. If this is just wire fraud as opposed to some kind of government corruption charge (tied to receipt of federal funds), maybe it should be higher to take that into account.
Given all that, my arbitrary number is two years. Cut it in half because he didn't personally benefit, but bump it back up because of the abuse of trust. Can I be a federal Judge now?
Posted by: Erik M | Mar 25, 2015 6:53:16 PM
"Can I be a federal Judge now?"
Nah. Republicans in control of Senate. Anyone nominated now will have a while to wait unless some special dispensation is made. Perhaps, if you explain why President Obama's immigration policies are illegal.
Posted by: Joe | Mar 26, 2015 12:51:40 PM