« Should a MasterChef episode include a nutraloaf/prison cooking challenge? | Main | "Does failed execution attempt mean Ohio prisoner can avoid death penalty?" »

June 7, 2015

"Expunging America's Rap Sheet in the Information Age"

The title of this post is the title of this notable new paper by Jenny Roberts now available via SSRN. Here is the abstract:

As the Wall Street Journal recently put it, “America has a rap sheet.”  Today, between 70 and 100 million people in the United States have a criminal arrest or conviction record, and anyone — including employers, landlords, and data collection companies — can easily access these records on line.  At the same time, collateral consequences of even the most minor offenses have increased exponentially, affecting employment, housing, parenting, and just about every other aspect of daily life.  The convergence of mass criminalization, ubiquitous criminal records, and pervasive collateral consequences is a major factor in the criminal justice system’s troubling racial and economic disparities.

States are reacting to the criminal records crisis in different ways, with many focusing on expanding record sealing or expungement laws that currently range widely in the relief offered.  The time has come for a well-tailored response to mass criminalization and collateral consequences in the information age.  Sealing and expungement laws must be part of a multi-faceted approach to alleviating harmful consequences of a criminal record.  The goal of limiting access to and use of relevant criminal records to those with a legitimate need to know is best advanced through focused legislative reform.

This Article describes why well-crafted sealing and expungement laws matter, responds to the major moral and practical arguments against such laws, and situates sealing and expungement as part of a comprehensive scheme for relief from a criminal record. Reforms might include regulating data brokers to ensure that sealed or expunged records are removed from their databases, banning employers from asking about arrests not ending in conviction or expunged convictions in the absence of a statutory mandate to do so, and offering employers who comply with such rules immunity from certain negligent hiring lawsuits.

June 7, 2015 at 11:11 AM | Permalink


Again, no mention of the necessity of crushing the tort bar. They will sue employers for negligent hiring, or intentionally negligent hiring. Many states already have laws mandating that an offense must be relevant to the job.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Jun 7, 2015 2:50:33 PM

To get to dismissal with prejudice on first pleading will cost a business $100,000. Immunity is not sufficient, because the tort bar will find some deficiency that cancels immunity. I mean, it has to be crushed, arrested, imprisoned.

A list of enemies should be compiled, and all product and service providers boycott these internal traitors. That should include doctors, so these internal enemies may die.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Jun 7, 2015 11:29:29 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB