« What accounts for decline in federal white-collar prosecutions (and should we care)? | Main | ABA Journal spotlights continued child porn federal sentencing challenges »

July 31, 2015

Executive facing "unprecedented" LWOP sentence for food-poisoned peanut butter

Download (8)I just came across this AP story from last week reporting on a notable sentence being urged by federal guidelines in a notable white-collar case.  Here are the details:

Federal court officers have recommended a sentence of life in prison for a peanut company executive convicted of selling salmonella-tainted food, a move that attorneys on both sides called “unprecedented” for a food-poisoning case. The potential life sentence for former Peanut Corporation of America owner Stewart Parnell was disclosed by prosecutors in a court filing Wednesday. Parnell, 61, is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 21 by a federal judge in Albany, Georgia....

Stewart Parnell ran the now-defunct company from his Bedford County home, just outside Lynchburg city limits.  Parnell's defense attorneys confirmed the recommendation Thursday to The Associated Press, calling the possible punishment “unprecedented.”  Bill Marler, a lawyer for victims sickened by peanut butter from Parnell's southwest Georgia plant, used the same word.

In fact, Marler and other experts say the trial of Parnell and two co-defendants last year was the first federal food-poisoning case to be tried by an American court.  A jury convicted Parnell of 71 counts including conspiracy, obstruction of justice, wire fraud and other crimes related to a salmonella outbreak in 2008 and 2009.  The Centers for Disease Control linked the outbreak to nine deaths and 714 illnesses.  It prompted one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history.

Justin Lugar, one of Parnell's defense attorneys, confirmed Thursday that the recommendation before Judge W. Louis Sands is for life in prison, with no lesser range. Parnell's lawyers are trying to persuade the judge to disregard numbers used as aggravating factors to boost the suggested sentence to its maximum: an estimate that Parnell's customers suffered $144 million in losses as well as health officials’ tally that 714 people got sick....

“That recommendation is truly absurd,” said Ken Hodges, an attorney on Parnell's defense team. “We hope the judge will see that Stewart Parnell never meant to hurt anyone. He ate the peanut butter himself. He fed it to his children and to his grandchildren.”...

“Life in prison, especially in a food case, it's frankly unprecedented,” said Marler, who has represented victims of food-borne illnesses for two decades. “But the case itself, on a factual basis, is unprecedented.” Marler said he suspects the judge and prosecutors will think carefully before deciding to pursue a life sentence for Parnell. Still, he said, even the possibility of such a stiff sentence sends a message to food companies....

Even if objections raised by Parnell's attorneys to the sentencing recommendation are denied, it's still possible the judge could impose a lighter sentence. Federal judges are required to consider recommendations based on complex sentencing guidelines, but they are not bound by them.

Parnell and his co-defendants were never charged with sickening or killing anybody. Instead prosecutors used the seven-week trial to lay out a paper trail of emails, lab results and billing records to show Parnell's company defrauded customers by using falsified test results to cover up lab screenings that showed batches of peanut butter contained salmonella. The tainted goods were shipped to Kellogg's and other food processors for use in products from snack crackers to pet food.

Prosecutors wrote that court officers “correctly calculated” Parnell's recommended sentence, but stopped short of saying whether they plan to ask the judge to impose a life sentence. A spokeswoman for the Justice Department in Washington, Nicole Navas, declined to comment.

Prosecutors’ legal briefs also noted stiff sentences were recommended for Parnell's two co-defendants. Punishment of 17 to 21 years in prison was recommended for Parnell's brother, food broker Michael Parnell, who was convicted on fewer counts. The recommendation for Mary Wilkerson, the Georgia plant's quality control manager, was eight to 10 years. She was convicted of obstruction of justice.

July 31, 2015 at 08:10 AM | Permalink

Comments

This sentence is the result of the charge of conspiracy and the defendants decision to go to trial.

Posted by: beth | Jul 31, 2015 11:39:59 AM

The sentence recommendation is based on dozens of felony counts for intentionally releasing adultrated food into interstate commerce and felony fraud. Parnell had contractual obligations to test for salmonella and often he did not; claimed "state of the art" food safety processes and had none. He shipped products after positive tests for salmonella, and falsified test results to positive results became negative.

The factual background and other analysis I have done is here
http://www.paulsjusticeblog.com/2014/09/mass_salmonella_poisoning_by_the_peanut_corporation_of_america.php

Posted by: Paul | Jul 31, 2015 5:46:46 PM

If he had knowledge and intentionally shipped salmonella contaminated peanut butter, after the first reported death, I would support the death penalty for the conspirators. This is not picking on sharp business practice. This is mass murder.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Aug 1, 2015 12:56:22 AM

As then Harvard Professor Oliver W. Holmes, Jr. noted during late Century XIX , a dog distinguishes between being stumbled over and being kicked •

At first , the defendants stumbled ; then they kicked — hard and repeatedly •

At least , Carroll’s Queen of Hearts is not the trial court •

Nemo Me Impune Lacessit

Posted by: Docile Jim Brady in Oregon | Aug 3, 2015 11:40:19 AM

Not generally a supporter of LWOP, but given that many folks face LWOP sentences for many other crimes violent and non-violent or in some case no-victim, its hard to see this case as an exception.

Posted by: alex | Aug 4, 2015 2:25:38 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB