« "From a First Arrest to a Life Sentence" | Main | Lots of justified attention for Judge Alex Kozinski's new article, "Criminal Law 2.0" »

July 16, 2015

Highlighting significant disparities in DUI homicide sentences in Florida

The Miami Herald has this interesting new article highlighting big differences in sentences handed out in Florida when a drunk driver kills.  The piece is headlined "A Florida DUI death conviction means prison — but for how long varies widely," and here are excerpts:

At 20, Kayla Mendoza tweeted “2 drunk 2 care” before killing two young women in a drunk-driving crash. She tearfully admitted guilt, but, faced with angry relatives of the dead, a Broward judge slammed her with a 24-year prison term.

Days later, a longtime alcoholic named Antonio Lawrence, 57, faced a Miami-Dade judge for plowing into a Liberty City restaurant while driving drunk, killing two church elders. Relatives offered earnest forgiveness. Lawrence got 10 years.

Downstairs on the very same day, in a courtroom with zero television news cameras, Edna Jean-Pierre, 27, took responsibility for killing one person in a DUI crash, then killing another in a hit-and-run crash — while out on bail in the first case. A Miami-Dade judge, Dennis Murphy, sentenced her to four years in prison....

There is a four-year mandatory minimum for a DUI manslaughter conviction in Florida, but as these recent cases show, prison terms vary widely from cases to case and, a Miami Herald data analysis shows, from county to county.

In over 400 fatality cases resolved in Florida since 2012, the statewide average sentence for DUI manslaughter is just under 10 years behind bars, according to a Herald analysis of prison records. Miami-Dade by far had the most cases in that time span, 66, and among the lightest average sentences with convicts serving an average of just over 6 years in prison. In Broward’s 27 cases, defendants in that time span are serving just under 10 years. “Broward has both a reputation and a reality of being harsher than Miami-Dade,” said Miami defense attorney David Weinstein....

Legal experts say the the reasons for the disparity in sentences are complex. Outcomes are swayed by a host of factors: the strength of evidence, the skill of defense attorneys, circumstances of a crash, a defendant’s criminal history, media glare and the desires of a victim’s loved ones. “Victims drive to a good degree what the sentence outcome will be,” said Miami attorney Rick Freedman. “Victims who are not active, not engaged with the state attorney’s office, are going to see a lower number in the sentencing.”...

The four-year minimum mandatory term is a recent addition to the law, added in 2007 over concerns about judges being too soft on drunk drivers who kill. Known as the “Adam Arnold Act,” the law was named after a Key West teen who died in a crash in 1996, a case in which the driver got only three years of probation.

Drivers convicted in fatal hit-and-run crashes — whether alcohol is detected or not — now also face a minimum of four years in prison. Lawmakers in 2014 passed the law, named after Miami cyclist Aaron Cohen, whose death spurred outrage after a Key Biscayne man got only two years behind bars for killing Cohen in the hit-and-run wreck.

Drunk drivers who kill rarely escape at least some prison time, and prosecutors can waive the minimum four years mandatory — like in a highly criticized 2009 case in Miami Beach involving a pro football player. Donte’ Stallworth, who played for five NFL teams, got 30 days in jail and a lengthy probation for killing a pedestrian crossing the MacArthur Causeway. For prosecutors, there was no guarantee of victory at trial — the victim, Mario Reyes, was not in a crosswalk that dark morning. The decision to support the lighter sentence hinged on Reyes’ relatives, who pushed for the deal and also received an undisclosed settlement from Stallworth.

Forgiveness from families can make a difference. In Lawrence’s case, he met with families of the two church elders killed in the crash, became heavily involved helping recovering alcoholics and even surrendered to jail early before pleading guilty. Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Diane Ward gave him 10 years, by no means a slap on the wrist, but much less than the 34 years he faced had he been convicted at trial.

“You’re dealing with people who are not criminals, not people who went to harm others,” said Assistant State Attorney David I. Gilbert, who oversees traffic homicide cases. “They are average citizens who have made a very serious mistake. Different judges deal with different cases in different ways.” The emotional reaction of relatives also can clash, with some urging leniency and others calling for heavy punishment, Gilbert said.

July 16, 2015 at 11:31 AM | Permalink

Comments

10 years is about the minimum mandatory prison sentence for a defendant with no prior record under Florida's statutory sentencing guidelines. The minimum mandatory under the guidelines can be departed from with a lighter sentence for statutorily listed mitigation. A deperture sentence is appeallable by the state.

Posted by: swamp thing | Jul 16, 2015 12:52:35 PM

that's departure

Posted by: swamp thing | Jul 16, 2015 12:53:23 PM

Am I alone in thinking the 24 year sentence is pretty disturbing? Was there some particular aggravating factor? What is the point of compounding the tragedy by imprisioning this poor young woman who made a horrible mistake for over two decades. The article suggests it is because the victims' families were not forgiving and seeking vengeance. Is that what these decisions should turn on? Is 5 or 10 years just not enough. In what universe does this make sense based on any justifications for punishment? It all seems driven by "hot" texts and not very rational over-reliance on a family's understandable grief.

Posted by: Mike | Jul 16, 2015 8:46:18 PM

The one I find disturbing is Edna Jean-Pierre, who was given a four year sentence after killing in two separate drunk driving episodes not even committed on the same day. The only thing I see as being remarkable about a twenty plus year sentence under such circumstances is that it would appear to be rare.

Posted by: Soronel Haetir | Jul 17, 2015 3:29:03 AM

Soronel Haetir,

I may well agree regarding Jean-Pierre. But you have not explained what that has to with the disturbing aspects of the 24-year sentence? Why is so much time needed? Is this woman is fundamentally a decent person and made a huge mistake (that she must live with forever), what exactly are we accomplishing. It seems like nobody on your side of this issue can articulate what justifies such a massive sentence for a crime that is based really on a horrible outcome, rather than intent. You are not being rigorous.

Posted by: Mike | Jul 17, 2015 10:12:54 AM

Mike,

Well, considering that I believe execution to be the correct outcome for all of the highlighted cases as I see it all of them have gotten off light.

Posted by: Soronel Haetir | Jul 17, 2015 1:54:35 PM

Soronel Haetir,

You have proven you are simply an idiot. Enough said.

Posted by: Mike | Jul 17, 2015 2:04:39 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB