« "Criminal Justice Reform Begins With Fair Sentencing and Fair Chances" | Main | Despite copious reform talk, big and tough federal drug sentencing system churns on »

August 28, 2015

Do tough sex offender restrictions really hurt women and children more than keeping them safe?

The question in the title of this post is prompted by this lengthy new Al-Jazeera America article headlined "Collateral damage: Harsh sex offender laws may put whole families at risk: Research says that registries and residency bans leave children of sex offenders vulnerable to bullying, homelessness." Here are excerpts:

In 1996, Congress passed Megan’s Law, which allowed states to publicize the names of those convicted of sex offenses. A wave of federal and state laws followed that created online sex offender registries, broadened who is listed and restricted where registrants can live.

But today there’s a growing body of research and court opinions questioning those laws’ effectiveness and constitutionality. No studies have looked at what proportion of the country’s nearly 850,000 people on state registries are providing for families of their own. Activists say, however, that thousands of female partners and children are being hurt by laws that aim to protect kids....

Vicki Henry, who runs Women Against the Registry, a group trying to roll back registration and residency laws nationwide, [with] volunteers operate a hotline for family members of registrants seeking help in dealing with the consequences of those laws. They field about 100 calls a month, Henry says.

The only quantitative study to date suggests how serious those consequences may be. In the American Journal of Criminal Justice in January 2009, researchers Jill Levenson and Richard Tewksbury reported on their survey of nearly 600 immediate family members of registrants. More than 20 percent said they had to move out of a rental because their landlord found their relative’s name on the registry, and 40 percent said they found it hard to find an affordable place to live.

Respondents said that their kids didn’t fare well either. Two-thirds reported that their children felt left out of activities because of their parent’s status, more than three-quarters said their children were depressed, and almost half reported that their children were harassed....

Two new qualitative studies provide more backing for the 2009 study findings. From 2010 to 2012, a team of researchers from four universities surveyed almost 450 registrants about the consequences for their families of their being on the list. Their report on the study ran in the October 2014 Justice Policy Journal. Another by two University of Delaware researchers involved surveys last year of 36 family members and interviews with 16 of them; it’s still under review for publication. Both studies asked open-ended questions, so the researchers couldn’t crunch any numbers. But key themes run through the responses — children being shunned and harassed, families struggling to find a place to live, wives losing friends and jobs because a husband is on the list....

Those families may be the collateral damage in a war on sex crimes that’s been underway since passage of Megan’s Law. But it’s far from clear that the chief weapons politicians have employed — registries and residency bans — are helping to protect children or the public.

None of the six studies on sex offender registries conducted between 1995 and 2011 found that registries lowered recidivism, according to a meta-analysis of 20 years of research in the November 2012 Journal of Crime and Justice. “Over the last 15 years, sex offender registries have been established in all empirical forums not to reduce sexual offending behavior, violence, or the number of victims,” Kristen Zgoba, coauthor of that study, wrote in an email.

There’s an even broader consensus on residency restrictions. A U.S. Department of Justice brief released last month concluded that “research has demonstrated that residence restrictions do not decrease and are not a deterrent for sexual recidivism.” And a December 2013 study report in the journal Criminal Justice Policy Review noted that Florida’s residency laws likely play a “significant role” in homelessness and transience among sex offenders.

August 28, 2015 at 11:41 AM | Permalink

Comments

Yes, sex offender restrictions hurt women and children more than help.

My youngest son was sick at school today. They called our house to let us know and to have somebody pick him up. I was at work and my husband was home. He can't pick up our kids from school because they don't let sex offenders on school property.
Because my husband is on supervised release, our son can not have friends in our house. The result is that our son is rarely home since he wants to be with his friends. We think we know what he is doing and kind of know who he is with, but as parents we can't be fully involved becasue of the restrictions of my husband's supervision.
What a huge joke at the taxpayer's expense.

Posted by: SSL | Aug 29, 2015 2:03:22 AM

As mentioned in the Quick Note, you need to enter the password of your iCloud email address once more. There is a spin to this technique. What is it, you ask.

Posted by: iCloud Sign Up | Nov 2, 2017 3:13:23 AM

You are searching for an application shop that has a massive package of costs applications that run both on android and also iphone tools, after that your alternative ought to be definitely tweakbox apk.

Posted by: tweakbox | Dec 8, 2017 5:52:46 AM

You are searching for an application shop that has a massive package of costs applications that run both on android and also iphone tools, after that your alternative ought to be definitely tweakbox apk.

Posted by: tweakbox | Dec 8, 2017 5:52:50 AM

whoah this blog is magnificent i really like reading your posts. Keep up the great work! You know, lots of people are searching around for this info, you could aid them greatly.

Posted by: iCloud signup | Jul 7, 2018 12:07:10 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

nice post......coto movies app

Posted by: coto movies app | Mar 11, 2019 8:46:06 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB