« Would prosecutors be less aggressive if significantly more monies were devoted to indigent criminal defense? | Main | "Prosecutorial Analytics" »

May 2, 2016

Digging deeply into Virginia's crowded prisons and parole paractices

A local public radio station in Virginia now has available at this link a detailed look as corrections practices in the state.  The umbrella title for all the coverage is "Crowded Prisons, Rare Parole: A Five Part Series," and here are the subheadings and introductions for each part of the series:

May 2, 2016 at 06:50 PM | Permalink

Comments

Four comments:

First, Virginia did not abolish parole. It just set a minimum eligibility date, 85% of imposed sentence must be served, before parole consideration.

Second, there should always be an incentive for good behavior. The politicians can call this incentive whatever they want, but it is still parole.

Three, the main reform that accompanied the "abolition" of parole in Virginia was the enactment of a truth in sentencing provision. Under the old law, whether or when a prisoner was granted parole was determined by a department in the Virginia DOC called Court and Legal, which utilized complicated rules to determine eligibility, which rendered the entire process opaque. As a practical matter, no one, including the judge, prosecutor, defendant, defense attorney, and victim, knew or could reasonably predict if or when a defendant would be granted parole. Anecdotally, a person could receive parole after serving, say 18 months, with an imposed sentence of 20 years. As a result, lengthy sentences were often imposed blindly simply to give Court and Legal the room to their job.

Fourth, this is the problem with many of the prisoners who received their sentences prior to the "abolition" of parole. Virginia law allows juries to make recommended sentences, which the judges impose nearly 100% of the time, and still do today. The Virginia Parole Board is unwilling to consider this lack of precision in the exercise of sentencing discretion for the prisoners who received their sentences under the old law.

Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2016 1:03:13 PM

The State of Virginia should be ashamed of what they are doing with The Parole System and Practices. If these imates have 25, 30, or more years in "Good Standing", then for God sake RELEASE them.....

Posted by: Carmela | Feb 24, 2017 4:24:30 PM

The Virginia Parole System should be ashamed of their selves. If a inmate has serviced 25, 30, or more, in "Good Standing" then for God Sake RELEASE them...

Posted by: Carmela | Feb 24, 2017 4:28:27 PM

I RUN THE PRISONER BEHIND BARS AND I AM INTEREST IN YOUR ARTICIAL... I WORK WITH A FEW PRISONER THAT MIGHT FALL INTO THAT...SO WHAT INFORMATION YOU CAN ADD INTO THIS I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND USE IT FOR THE ESSAY THAT I AM WRITING NOW...I PLANING TO GET INTO THIS SUBJECT AS MUCH THAT I CAN.

Posted by: SUZANNEVARNER | Mar 28, 2017 12:29:53 PM

i like to see alot of there inmates out..i have a friend who been denied twice and they still denied him .. he runs a class in the prison he in andhe been behaving and he knows he done wrong..he even and alot of people wrote the board...i like to know what he can do now?

Posted by: SUZANNEVARNER | Mar 28, 2017 12:34:03 PM

need to look into this prison system ...it has been broken down so bad that they lock them up and threw away the key..maybe we need to do is let the judge do the job cause right now paroled board keeping them in.. they need to clean out the prison system and give the bed to who deserves the bed. i work with inmates that should be out...

Posted by: SUZANNEVARNER | Mar 28, 2017 12:39:40 PM

I would like to see something done with parole. I believe in second chances some inmates are in prison and are truly good people who have made mistakes in life. I believe inmates who are no trouble and are making changes inside to better themselves deserve another chance as rehabilitated inmates with a new outlook on life..people change especially after living life in darkness of a prison cell

Posted by: Andrea Kertley | Mar 30, 2017 10:34:14 PM

It is inhumane to lock someone up and throw away the key. That is cruel and unusual punishment by any standard except for the most violent of all criminals. Virginia's Truth in Sentencing takes away a majority of the motivation for prisoners to rehabilitate, it increases taxpayer cost of both inmate care and assistance programs broken up families may need apply for because the bread winner is behind bars and it has a spiraling social cost.

One problem Truth in Sentencing was trying to solve was recidivism. Instead of taking the humane route and investing in a better probation and parole system, Virginia is spending more money housing more offenders. They have taken the eye for an eye approach and ignored the cost in dollars and the cost to people. This is backwards thinking at best and malicious ignorance at its worst. Virginia can do better. Atty.

Posted by: Jack | May 26, 2017 8:23:15 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB