« Would prosecutors be less aggressive if significantly more monies were devoted to indigent criminal defense? | Main | "Prosecutorial Analytics" »
May 2, 2016
Digging deeply into Virginia's crowded prisons and parole paractices
A local public radio station in Virginia now has available at this link a detailed look as corrections practices in the state. The umbrella title for all the coverage is "Crowded Prisons, Rare Parole: A Five Part Series," and here are the subheadings and introductions for each part of the series:
-
Part One: Virginia Has Lowest Parole Rate in the Nation: It’s been more than 20 years since Virginia abolished parole, and over that time the prison population has grown to more than 30,000 people. Just over 10% of them committed crimes before the law changed, so they’re still eligible for parole, but few of them are getting out, and the state now spends more than a billion dollars a year on prisons and correctional programs.
-
Part Two: Secret Proceedings Offer Little Hope of Parole: Virginia abolished parole in 1995, but people who committed crimes before then — more than 3,300 of them — are still eligible, and a board of five people decides who gets out.
-
Part Three: Why the Parole Board Rarely Paroles: In a survey of 1,000 Virginians, 75% said the prison population is costing too much — nearly $28,000 per inmate per year. Two-thirds thought the correctional system should reinstate parole, allowing early release for those inmates who are unlikely to commit new crimes. Even people who considered themselves conservative supported that idea by a margin of two to one. Still, Republicans in the legislature oppose parole, and the board empowered to release people who were convicted before parole was abolished frees only a few inmates each year.
-
Part Four: Paring Virginia's Prison Population: Last year, Governor McAuliffe set up a commission to explore the possibility of reinstating parole — a system of early release for prisoners who follow the rules and are unlikely to commit new crimes. After months of hard work, the group decided not to make a recommendation. Republicans in the legislature had already made it clear they would not support parole. Instead, the commission issued a 50-page report on other ways to reduce its prison population.
-
Conclusion: Five Years in Prison for Pot: Lawmakers who oppose liberalizing Virginia’s marijuana laws claim no one goes to jail for possessing small amounts of the drug, but a second offense or selling pot does put people in prison. With four states now allowing businesses to profit from the sale of marijuana — and taxing those transactions, some Virginians now question the wisdom of spending nearly $28,000 a year to lock people up for using or even selling marijuana.
May 2, 2016 at 06:50 PM | Permalink
Comments
Four comments:
First, Virginia did not abolish parole. It just set a minimum eligibility date, 85% of imposed sentence must be served, before parole consideration.
Second, there should always be an incentive for good behavior. The politicians can call this incentive whatever they want, but it is still parole.
Three, the main reform that accompanied the "abolition" of parole in Virginia was the enactment of a truth in sentencing provision. Under the old law, whether or when a prisoner was granted parole was determined by a department in the Virginia DOC called Court and Legal, which utilized complicated rules to determine eligibility, which rendered the entire process opaque. As a practical matter, no one, including the judge, prosecutor, defendant, defense attorney, and victim, knew or could reasonably predict if or when a defendant would be granted parole. Anecdotally, a person could receive parole after serving, say 18 months, with an imposed sentence of 20 years. As a result, lengthy sentences were often imposed blindly simply to give Court and Legal the room to their job.
Fourth, this is the problem with many of the prisoners who received their sentences prior to the "abolition" of parole. Virginia law allows juries to make recommended sentences, which the judges impose nearly 100% of the time, and still do today. The Virginia Parole Board is unwilling to consider this lack of precision in the exercise of sentencing discretion for the prisoners who received their sentences under the old law.
Posted by: Fred | May 4, 2016 1:03:13 PM
The State of Virginia should be ashamed of what they are doing with The Parole System and Practices. If these imates have 25, 30, or more years in "Good Standing", then for God sake RELEASE them.....
Posted by: Carmela | Feb 24, 2017 4:24:30 PM
The Virginia Parole System should be ashamed of their selves. If a inmate has serviced 25, 30, or more, in "Good Standing" then for God Sake RELEASE them...
Posted by: Carmela | Feb 24, 2017 4:28:27 PM
I RUN THE PRISONER BEHIND BARS AND I AM INTEREST IN YOUR ARTICIAL... I WORK WITH A FEW PRISONER THAT MIGHT FALL INTO THAT...SO WHAT INFORMATION YOU CAN ADD INTO THIS I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND USE IT FOR THE ESSAY THAT I AM WRITING NOW...I PLANING TO GET INTO THIS SUBJECT AS MUCH THAT I CAN.
Posted by: SUZANNEVARNER | Mar 28, 2017 12:29:53 PM
i like to see alot of there inmates out..i have a friend who been denied twice and they still denied him .. he runs a class in the prison he in andhe been behaving and he knows he done wrong..he even and alot of people wrote the board...i like to know what he can do now?
Posted by: SUZANNEVARNER | Mar 28, 2017 12:34:03 PM
need to look into this prison system ...it has been broken down so bad that they lock them up and threw away the key..maybe we need to do is let the judge do the job cause right now paroled board keeping them in.. they need to clean out the prison system and give the bed to who deserves the bed. i work with inmates that should be out...
Posted by: SUZANNEVARNER | Mar 28, 2017 12:39:40 PM
I would like to see something done with parole. I believe in second chances some inmates are in prison and are truly good people who have made mistakes in life. I believe inmates who are no trouble and are making changes inside to better themselves deserve another chance as rehabilitated inmates with a new outlook on life..people change especially after living life in darkness of a prison cell
Posted by: Andrea Kertley | Mar 30, 2017 10:34:14 PM
It is inhumane to lock someone up and throw away the key. That is cruel and unusual punishment by any standard except for the most violent of all criminals. Virginia's Truth in Sentencing takes away a majority of the motivation for prisoners to rehabilitate, it increases taxpayer cost of both inmate care and assistance programs broken up families may need apply for because the bread winner is behind bars and it has a spiraling social cost.
One problem Truth in Sentencing was trying to solve was recidivism. Instead of taking the humane route and investing in a better probation and parole system, Virginia is spending more money housing more offenders. They have taken the eye for an eye approach and ignored the cost in dollars and the cost to people. This is backwards thinking at best and malicious ignorance at its worst. Virginia can do better. Atty.
Posted by: Jack | May 26, 2017 8:23:15 PM