Rounding up some recent commentary on recent Brock Turner controversies

Folks who following notable sentencing stories, and the notable reactions from various folks to notable sentencing stories, surely know the name Brock Turner.  And recent developments in his sentencing saga have prompted another round of useful commentary from various sources.  Here is a sample of this commentary, via links and full headlined:

• From Mic here, "Brock Turner just registered as a sex offender. Here's what that means for him."

• From The National Review here, "California Democrats Suddenly Think Mandatory Minimums Are a Good Idea"

• From Slate here, "The Armed Protests Outside Brock Turner’s Home Are Dangerously Counterproductive"

• From Vox here, "The justice system needs to take rape more seriously. That doesn’t mean longer prison sentences."

Some (of many) prior related posts on the Brock Turner case:

• Lots of seemingly justifiable outrage after lenient California sentencing of privileged man convicted of three felony counts of sexual assault
• Lots more mainstream and new media commentary on lenient sentencing of Stanford sex assaulter
• "The Stanford rape case demonstrates liberal hypocrisy on issues of basic fairness in the criminal justice system"
• Juror involved in trial of Stanford swimmer Brick Turner assails sentence given for sexual assault convictions
• Considering the potential negative consequences of the Stanford rape sentencing controversy and judge recall effort
• California legislators introduce bill seeking to mandate that any future Brock Turners face three-year minimum prison terms