« The challenge of taking stock of impact of Holder Memos to gauge possible impact of new Sessions Memo | Main | Senator Rand Paul criticizes new Sessions Memo while promising to reintroduce Justice Safety Valve Act »
May 15, 2017
One last chance to RSVP for "Behind the Bench: The Past, Present, and Future of Federal Sentencing"
As mentioned in this prior post, I will be attending this exciting afternoon event, titled "Behind the Bench: The Past, Present, and Future of Federal Sentencing," which is taking place this Wednesday (5/17) in Washington DC. I considered the event quite timely when I posted about it last week, but the discussions generated by Attorney General Jeff Sessions new charging memo for federal prosecutors only serves to add an extra-timely dimension to the topics to be discussed.
As mentioned before, this event emerges from a thoughtful and provocative federal sentencing reform proposal put forward by current Acting US Sentencing Commission Chair Judge William Pryor (in part because that he graciously allowed this proposal to published in the Federal Sentencing Reporter). Through my work with FSR, I played a small role in getting this event off the ground, and here is the event's description from this webpage where one can register to attend:
Thirty years ago, the U.S. Sentencing Commission established the first-ever set of federal sentencing guidelines. Those initial Guidelines received a chilly reception as more than 200 federal judges found them unconstitutional. Although the Supreme Court’s United States v. Booker decision in 2005 upheld the basic structure of the Guidelines, it recast them as “effectively advisory” to allow judges to continue applying the Guidelines consistent with new Sixth Amendment jurisprudence.
The Booker ruling stated Congress was free to devise a different system moving forward. More than a dozen years and nearly a million federal sentences later, Congress has yet to act despite diverse criticisms of the Supreme Court’s advisory sentencing scheme. This spotlights an enduring question: What is the proper relationship between the legislative and judicial branches in determining sentencing policy?
On May 17, please join the Charles Koch Institute, the Federal Sentencing Reporter, and the Law & Economics Center at George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School as we explore this question and discuss how we can learn from the past to improve present and future federal sentencing policy.
KEYNOTE SPEAKER: Judge William H. Pryor
MODERATED DISCUSSION: Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa and Judge Patti B. Saris
MODERATOR: Vikrant P. Reddy
Date: May 17
Time: 12:00 pm - 2:45 pm
I have been told that there is still a little bit of the limited space available, so folks interested in attending what ought to be a very interesting afternoon of federal sentencing discussion should still be sure to register via this webpage ASAP.
May 15, 2017 at 05:24 PM | Permalink
Comments
The future of sentencing must be for robots to apply algorithms written by the legislature.
Machines are 100 times better than living beings. All those who object to robotic judges must ride a horse, commuting to work, in winter.
Posted by: David Behar | May 16, 2017 6:43:50 PM