« Two notable summary reversals from SCOTUS after circuits failed, yet again, to properly follow AEDPA | Main | A number of executions in a number of states generating a number of notable stories and commentary »
November 6, 2017
NAAUSA and six other law enforcement groups write to Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, per the attached letter.
Last week I blogged here about a letter sent to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee on behalf of the Federal Public and Community Defenders to urge passage of legislation to reform federal mandatory sentencing laws. Today I received a copy of a quite different letter also sent to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee this time coming from the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys and six other law enforcement groups. Here is how the letter, which can be downloaded below, gets started:
We write to express the opposition of the undersigned organizations to the recently-introduced Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017 (S. 1917). We represent federal, state and local law enforcement officers, agents and prosecutors responsible for the investigation and prosecution of drug traffickers and other violent offenders involved in the distribution and sale of dangerous drugs.
The public safety of our communities across the nation would be negatively impacted by this legislation. The legislation undermines mandatory minimum penalties for drug trafficking and weakens the tools that law enforcement authorities need to enforce the law, prosecute criminals and dismantle domestic and international drug trafficking organizations. The legislation authorizes the early release of thousands of previously convicted armed career criminals, serial violent criminals, and repeat drug traffickers. And it will make it more difficult for law enforcement to pursue the most culpable drug dealers and secure their cooperation to pursue others in drug distribution rings and networks, domestic and international.
The bill would undermine law enforcement investigatory efforts by giving serious criminals the best of both worlds: less sentencing exposure and the choice to not cooperate with law enforcement in further investigatory efforts.
This is not the time for the Congress to consider changes like these that will impair the ability of law enforcement to take serious drug traffickers off the street. Violent crime across America continues to grow, and a raging heroin and opioid abuse epidemic shows no sign of ebbing. For the second year in a row, violent crime increased across the United States, according to FBI annual crime data. Homicides increased by 8.6%, with cities like Baltimore, Chicago, and Kansas City, Missouri witnessing massive increases in their homicide rates. Meanwhile, a national epidemic of overdose deaths, caused largely by heroin and opioid drug abuse, ravages the country. No state is immune from the deadly consequences. Over 47,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2014, an all-time high. In 2015 that number rose to 50,000; last year it continued to skyrocket to 64,000 people. Daily drug overdose deaths, including those from heroin use, exceed those caused by auto accidents.
November 6, 2017 at 04:24 PM | Permalink
Comments
These are the views of people on the street.
Posted by: David Behar | Nov 6, 2017 7:18:19 PM
So what have these dumbf--ks been doing for 40 years because nothing they are proposing to continue or that hasn't already been in place for at least 30 of those 40 yrs. has appeared to be working. Jailing our way out of the problems has been shown not to be most effective direction to date. Time to think and emerge out of the box these troglodyte public servants have codified in our present judicial system.
Posted by: Rick | Nov 6, 2017 7:37:07 PM
You filthy, heartless, sub human, piece of shit lawyers had the church mass murderer over and over. You dirty scum loosed him to kill babies, instead of killing him first.
This massacre is 100% the fault of this filthy traitor lawyer profession. Then you allowed this felon to buy guns and body armor.
Only a neighbor, a civilian, was able to stop him. Only neighbors chased him at 95 mph. No doubt, you low life scum are thinking of what claims could be made against the neighbors.
Posted by: David Behar | Nov 6, 2017 9:28:27 PM