« Lots of notable reaction to Prez Trump's nominations to the US Sentencing Commission | Main | With death of Alva Campbell, Ohio need no longer worry about trying to execute ill prisoner after first botched attempt »

March 2, 2018

"The State of Justice Reform 2017"

Download (11)The title of this post is the name of this terrific new resource created by the Vera Institute of Justice. The resource is packed with lots and lots of notable content and links, and here is how it is explained on its "About" page: 

Like many justice reform organizations, Vera is often asked, “What are the latest and most interesting developments in the field?” This question has grown more common as more and more people confront the need to improve the nation’s broken justice system and want to help.

We endeavor in this report to provide the beginning of an answer, limiting our scope (mostly) to 2017, the first year of a new administration — one pushing a “law and order” platform — and covering most, but not all, areas of justice reform.

Vera’s task was to determine which of the thousands of changes to policy, practice, and legislation should be covered in this annual recap.  To discern what should be included, we first asked Vera’s own internal experts to weigh in and identify what they felt was most important to cover in their subject areas. “Importance” was defined by the following criteria:

  • the potential impact of a reform;
  • the degree of change from past practice or norms; and/or
  • the degree to which the field or the media is looking to a reform as a promising or leading practice to improve systems.

Using this definition, “importance” can be positive or negative, supportive or hostile to reform. The report thus focuses on both the best and the worst of 2017.

After hearing from Vera’s own experts, we reached outward, crowdsourcing suggestions from Vera’s Facebook and Twitter followings.  Vera also invited 30 external experts to review drafts of specific sections, who are gratefully acknowledged under “Contributors.”  Finally, Vera is issuing this as a digital report to allow for ongoing feedback and contributions, with the hope that this dialogue will add even more to the collective knowledge base about the year that was.

All parts of this terrific resource are worth checking out, and these parts should be of particular interest to sentencing fans:

The State of Jails: Reformers Look to Jails as a Key to Ending Mass Incarceration

The State of Youth Justice: As Youth Incarceration Drops, Racial Disparities Persist

The State of Sentencing & Decriminalization: While Federal Sentencing Reform Efforts Look Bleak, States Push Ahead

The State of Prisons: States Take on Prison Reform

The State of Reentry: For Those Rejoining Society, a Multitude of Obstacles Persist

March 2, 2018 at 10:42 AM | Permalink


All racial disparities in incarceration are acutally insufficient. They undervalue black victimization.

Posted by: David Behar | Mar 2, 2018 12:49:56 PM

The case of Harmelin v. Michigan came up recently.

Harmelin lost 5-4. Then, the Michigan Supreme Court decided the other way in another case. But, looking into it, found reference of him still being in prison in the mid-1990s. Whatever happened to him?

Consider Rummel v. Estelle. Rummel lost 5-4. He subsequently won on ineffective of counsel grounds. Then, pleaded guilty to theft by false pretenses and was sentenced to time served under the terms of a plea-bargaining agreement.

A lesson regarding the limits of judicial rulings -- some "wins" turn out to be limited as well. Anyway, I wonder what happened to Harmelin.

Posted by: Joe | Mar 2, 2018 10:37:47 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB