« Prez Trump reportedly has decided he will not support federal criminal justice bill before mid-term election | Main | Will Prez Trump deliver on all the clemency "tidal wave" of hopefulness he has engendered? »

August 23, 2018

"Young Adults and Criminal Jurisdiction"

The title of this post is the title of this new paper by Kevin Lapp now available via SSRN. Here is its abstract:

As measured by developmental biology, cultural markers, and self-perception, adolescence is longer today than it has ever been in human history, with leading psychologists asserting that it lasts into the mid-twenties.  This Article considers whether the extension of adolescence requires changing the allocation of criminal jurisdiction over young adults aged eighteen to twenty-five.  It explores three possible responses: (1) keeping young adults within general jurisdiction criminal courts with greater accommodations, (2) expanding juvenile court jurisdiction beyond age seventeen, and (3) creating specialized Young Adult courts.

The Article argues that criminal court’s emphasis on punishment and incapacitation are ill-suited to the individualized interventions that best serve the public’s long-term interest in safety and best promote a successful transition to adulthood.  Expanding juvenile court jurisdiction would make its rehabilitative approach available to young adult offenders who, like juveniles, are not yet fully-developed adults.  But it would also mean the loss of important procedural rights and a paternalistic, inquisitorial, interventionist approach that is not appropriate for young adults.

Specialized courts dedicated to eighteen to twenty-five year-olds offer a developmentally-informed response at the front and back end of cases without unduly complicating the work of the juvenile court, avoid potential due process and rights problems, and communicate to these offenders that they are worthy of something other than punitive, assembly-line treatment as criminals.  That said, creating young adult courts across the nation faces several challenges and carries potential drawbacks for those diverted to young adult court and for the remainder left behind in criminal court.

August 23, 2018 at 09:53 PM | Permalink


"...with leading psychologists asserting that it lasts into the mid-twenties..."

I love the wording here. Notice they did not say there was a consensus among psychologists that adolescence lasts into the 20s. There is not. There not even a majority of psychologists who think that. Rather they base their entire argument on what "leading" psychologists say. And who are these leading psychologists? Why psychologist who agree with their own public policy preferences.

Funny how that works.

Posted by: Daniel | Aug 24, 2018 10:31:58 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB