« New York Court of Appeals rules noncitizen defendants have Sixth Amendment jury trial right when charges carry potential penalty of deportation | Main | "Lessons for Sentencing Reform and Reentry: A Case Study of Project New Opportunity" »
November 28, 2018
Despite push by Prez and VP and support of at least 70 senators, odds of a Senate vote on FIRST STEP Act still reportedly "less than 50/50"
Politico has this lengthy report, headlined "White House makes last-ditch push on criminal justice reform bill," on the state of debate among Senate Republicans concerning the FIRST STEP Act. Here are details:
The Trump administration and a bloc of Republican senators are making a last-ditch attempt to pass a criminal justice reform bill in the lame duck session.
In a closed-door party lunch on Tuesday, Vice President Mike Pence made a strong endorsement of the bill to Senate Republicans, senators said, emphasizing that the GOP could take a clear win in the lame duck with passage. And supporters said they picked up votes during the discussion; one supportive GOP senator said they’ve accrued more than 20 hard “yes” votes and that another dozen or so GOP senators are gettable, which would likely be enough to easily pass the bill — if leadership will bring it up.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) maintained his poker face at the meeting, other than to reiterate the Senate’s short calendar. Asked to assess the prospect that McConnell will put the sentencing and prison reform bill on the floor, one attendee said: “Less than 50/50.”...
“A lot of people like me are still trying to understand what it does,” said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who characterized Tuesday’s critical meeting as a “higher level discussion of whether we should attempt to do it.”
As they assess the bill‘s prospects, GOP leaders are also asking senators whether they'd prefer to deal with the bill next year after Democrats take over the House, according to two sources familiar with the matter. That would dismantle a fragile bipartisan agreement and require Republicans and Democrats alike to essentially start over.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is still trying to garner more support for the bill, which would lower mandatory minimum sentences for some drug-related felonies, expand a program for early release, promote training programs in prison and require inmates be placed in prisons closer to their homes. He and other advocates say they are open to changing the bill’s treatment of some criminals in order to win new supporters.
“We’re still working on getting additional yeses or additional cosponsors,” Grassley said, noting that the only way to overcome opposition from Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and others was to increase co-sponsorship. He added that “we’re talking about no announcement before a couple days.”
McConnell is loath to take up the bill on the floor to prevent a circular firing squad among Republicans. But that’s already happening both in public and private: After trading blows on Twitter in recent days, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Cotton each gave opposing speeches about the bill in the lunch.
But supporters said they have the momentum and estimated only a half-dozen Republicans will be difficult to convince: Cotton, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), Jim Risch (R-Idaho) and Deb Fischer (R-Neb.). “Over half of the Republicans are for it, and maybe 80 percent, 90 percent, maybe all of the Democrats support it,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) said. “Things are all moving in the right direction.”
Still, Sen. Marco Rubio said that he is skeptical of the bill, particularly when it comes to classification of crimes and said he is “not sure there is anything” that could win him over. And a small bloc of Republicans, led by Cotton and Kennedy, are vocally going after the bill. Kennedy called it “ass backwards” in an interview and said he had “serious philosophical problems with the criminal justice bill.” It “takes all our authority and gives it to a bunch of bureaucrats,” he said.
The Senate also needs to pass a spending bill by Dec. 7 to avoid a partial government shutdown, and lawmakers are trying to wrap up negotiations around the Farm Bill. The criminal justice bill is regarded as a “maybe” that could potentially wait until next year. A version of the bill has already passed the House.
Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said that the bill “is still being evaluated and people are still trying to figure out where they stand.” He said McConnell has made no final decision....
But no matter what, there will be detractors. Cotton told reporters Tuesday that while the House’s version of the bill was “fixable,” the Senate’s draft of the legislation has “gone consistently to the left.”
If only a handful of Republicans supported this bill, I could understand why (but would still be frustrated) the Senate Majority Leader would not want to bring forward a bill favored more by his opposing party than by his own party. But this Politico report reinforces my sense that a majority of GOP Senators would vote for the FIRST STEP Act and that a super-majority of all Senators (representing a super-super majority of the nation's population) want this legislation enacted. That a few Senators from a few states can, in essence, exercise a heckler's veto highlights why thoughtful federal criminal justice reform has been so very hard. Sigh.
Some of many prior related posts:
- House Judiciary Committee approves FIRST STEP Act by a vote of 25-5 after lots of discussion of amendments
- FIRST STEP Act passes US House of Representatives by vote of 360-59(!), but its fate in Senate remains uncertain
- Interesting new US Sentencing Commission analysis of possible impact of Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2017
- Prez Trump pledges to sign prison reform that will be "best in the world"
- Large group of former prisoners urge Senate leaders to move forward with FIRST STEP Act
- FAMM provides detailed review of SRCA sentencing provisions most likely to be added to FIRST STEP Act
- Senator Cotton delivers faulty arguments to prop up faulty federal sentencing system
- Could enhanced FIRST STEP Act get more than 90 votes in the Senate if ever brought up for a vote?
- Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell promises floor vote on FIRST STEP Act after midterm election if more than 60 Senators want to move forward
- Prez Trump reportedly to announce support for FIRST STEP Act with sentencing provisions, greatly increasing its prospects for swift passage
- Senator Tom Cotton, rather than argue against FIRST STEP Act, makes case for what should be in a SECOND STEP Act
- Four changes to the FIRST STEP Act sought by Senator Tom Cotton
- Senator Tom Cotton continuing to do everything he can to try to keep the FIRST STEP Act from moving forward
- A notable debunking of "Three Myths From Critics of Criminal Justice Reform"
- FIRST STEP Act, already compromised to cater to tough-on-crime crowd, may be watered down further for Senate vote
November 28, 2018 at 12:12 AM | Permalink
Comments
Looks like McConnell is going to save Republicans from themselves.
Posted by: federalist | Nov 28, 2018 8:06:22 AM
Haha, "It takes all our authority and gives it to bureaucrats." You bunch of lazy, spineless cowards have been doling your authority out to bureaucrats by the boxcar load for 50 years. And, when you prove incapable of competently wielding your authority, that's exactly what you should do.
Posted by: Fat Bastard | Nov 28, 2018 9:10:52 AM
Is this how you think democracy should work, federalist?
Posted by: Doug B. | Nov 28, 2018 5:32:51 PM
Lame deal anyway.
Posted by: whatever | Nov 28, 2018 6:02:07 PM
Last I checked, we live in a Constitutional republic, not a democracy. So no, I don't think this is how democracy is supposed to work, but this is how our republic works.
Posted by: federalist | Nov 28, 2018 7:50:45 PM
federalist, isn't it typically the case in any form of a constitutional republic that the policy preferences of a super-majority of representatives can and will become law (subject to some constitutional boundaries), and that no office-holder can or will be in a position of absolute power? Here is seems Senator McConnell is wielding absolute power to potentially thwart the work of a super-majority of representatives.
Notably, when a President (who gets elected by the votes of the whole nation) decides to veto legislation, it only takes 67 Senators and 290 Representatives to override the veto. Here is seems a single Senator elected by voters in one state can thwart the votes of perhaps 80+ Senators and maybe 350+ Representatives.
I surmise you like the policy outcome of there not being a vote on the FIRST STEP Act, federalist, but is this really how you think our Constitutional republic should be run?
Posted by: Doug B | Nov 28, 2018 11:30:23 PM