« Fourth Circuit affirms officer Michael Slager "conviction" (by a judge at sentencing) of murdering Walter Scott | Main | "The Accuracy, Equity, and Jurisprudence of Criminal Risk Assessment" »
January 9, 2019
Spotlighting problems with immediate application of expanded good time credit in the FIRST STEP Act
This new Reuters article, headlined "Error in U.S. prisons law means well-behaved inmates wait longer for release," reports on what appears to be a significant drafting hiccup in the expansion of good time credits through the FIRST STEP Act. Here are the details:
U.S. prisoners who were expecting earlier release for good behavior, thanks to a new criminal justice law enacted last month, must keep waiting due to an error in the bill, said activists working with the White House to fix the mistake.
Potentially thousands of inmates could be affected by the error in the First Step Act, signed into law on Dec. 21 by Republican President Donald Trump in a rare example of bipartisanship in Washington, with both Democrats and Republicans backing it.
The law required the Justice Department’s Bureau of Prisons (BOP), among other measures, to retroactively recalculate good behavior credits, a step that had been expected to reduce some inmates’ sentences by as many as 54 days per year. Previously, inmates could only earn up to 47 days per year toward early release for good behavior.
Advocates of the law expected the bill’s enactment into law meant that several thousand inmates would get their freedom right away, in time for the 2018 holiday season. But a drafting error in the language of the law has prevented the Justice Department from immediately applying the new method of calculating good-behavior credits, they said.
“You have thousands of families who thought the day this bill passed, their loved ones’ sentence was going to be recalculated and they were going to walk out of their halfway house, their home confinement ... or leave prison,” said Kevin Ring, president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM). “It’s a frustrating mistake,” Ring said.
Wyn Hornbuckle, a Justice Department spokesman, said the department is analyzing changes for the law and plans to “carry out all necessary steps.”
Reuters has seen a letter sent to inmates at the Federal Correctional Institution Coleman, a federal prison in Florida, in which officials acknowledged the new good-behavior credits would not take effect yet. “The law will allow BOP in the future to apply 54 days of credit for every year a sentence was imposed, which is a change to the prior law,” the letter says. “While this change may result in additional credit for inmates in the future, it is not effective immediately nor is it applicable to all inmates,” it says....
Activists said the law, as drafted, confused good-behavior credits, which reduce a sentence, with earned-time credits, which do not. Earned-time credits allow certain inmates to qualify for early transfer to halfway houses. The law also mistakenly said that new rules on good-behavior credits could not kick in until BOP finishes a risk-assessment process for deciding which inmates can get earned-time credits.
Whether the error can be promptly fixed was unclear. A federal judge in Chicago on Jan. 3 denied a prisoner’s request to be released earlier for good behavior, citing the letter of the law. “This court is not unsympathetic to the apparent inequity of petitioner’s situation,” wrote U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. “This court, however, is obligated to apply the law as it is written.”
Several activists for prisoners told Reuters their groups are working with the White House on whether the Justice Department can find a work-around or if a legislative fix needs to be tucked into a broader spending bill for action by Congress. Ring said his group is also in talks with lawmakers.
The error comes at a difficult time, with the federal government in a partial shutdown. The Justice Department is one of several agencies partially closed because its funding ran out on Dec. 22 and has not been renewed by Congress.
As I understand this problem, it flows from the fact that the enacted version of the FIRST STEP Act has the expanded good time credits provision tucked within sections of the Act which is said to be effective only when the Attorney General has created "a risk and needs assessment system" that the AG has 210 days to develop. This placement leads to the view that the expanded good time credits cannot be applied until the risk and needs assessment system gets developed later in 2019. I am not sure that is the only plausible reading of these provisions of the FIRST STEP Act, but it sounds as though this is the reading now being adopted by the Bureau of Prisons (and maybe some courts). Such a reading would seem to mean prisoners will not get the benefit of expanded good time credits until at least July 2019.
The expanded good time credits provided by the FIRST STEP Act only amount to an additional week off a sentence for every year served. So even for those prisoners clearly impacted by this problem, this temporary snafu may only mean a few more week or months in custody before release. But for prisoners and their families hoping to see freedom a few weeks or months earlier in 2019, this really stinks.
January 9, 2019 at 06:13 PM | Permalink
Comments
Fucking idiots. Pardon my french. Or, possibly more likely, this is a very cynical attempt to increase good time as originally intended while not doing so it all.
Despite the Senate being the "upper" house, I frequently find it to be a much stupider body than the house.
Posted by: Fat Bastard | Jan 10, 2019 8:58:04 PM
The BOP has resisted this since the beginning. The only fix that was needed was re-consideration of their administrative rule interpreting the good time statute. They know and have known what Congress intended with the good time statute. They just don't care.
Posted by: defendergirl | Jan 11, 2019 10:37:19 AM
I don't really get why BOP acts like they have a vested interest in keeping people incarcerated. It isn't like they going to run out of convicts anytime soon and they are currently overcrowded and understaffed to a point that is probably close to a Constitutional dimension.
Posted by: Fat Bastard | Jan 11, 2019 2:38:50 PM
I am a defense attorney and recently learned that not all federal judges are applying the enlarged Safety Valve provisions under the First Step Act until the new Sentencing Guidelines are published, Nov. 1, 2019. Has anyone else encountered this in federal court?
Posted by: Mary Ann Leichty | May 19, 2019 8:43:05 PM