« Rounding up some commentary on Gov Newsom's formal halting of executions in California | Main | Split Seventh Circuit panel tangles with Second Amendment's second-class status and felon exclusion from right to bear arms »
March 17, 2019
"Criminal justice reform must do more than shrink prison populations"
The title of this post is the headline of this recent Hill commentary authored by David Harding, Jeffrey Morenoff and Jessica Wyse. I recommend the full piece, and here are excerpts:
Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) introduced the Next Step Act on March 7, an expansion of the criminal justice reform started with December’s First Step Act. We applaud the Next Step Act for essential reforms, including reducing mandatory minimums for nonviolent drug offenses.
Yet, reversing the harms that have been created by decades of mass incarceration and an overly punitive and racially-biased criminal justice system requires more than reversing past policy mistakes. Reform should go beyond shrinking prisons to providing those whose lives have been impacted by mass incarceration with real opportunities that lead to reintegration into society after release....
[R]eintegration requires more than just determination and work ethic, a key finding of our three-year study of the day-to-day lives of formerly incarcerated individuals. About a third struggle with hunger, homelessness and housing instability.
Chronic physical and mental health problems are also common. Jobs are scarce for those with criminal records, who disproportionately move into communities like Detroit with high unemployment. Half of those released from prison return within three years. The period immediately after release is both a time of great risk and an opportunity to ensure that each person starts with a strong foundation of health and material security.
This “re-entry moment” is one of optimism, commitment to a new life and family support, but also a critical time of struggle with hunger, homelessness, employment and sobriety. Investments in housing, health and employment services during the re-entry moment can create that foundation.
The Next Step Act contains worthy provisions for removing barriers to employment, including certain occupational licensing barriers for those with criminal records. Yet our research shows that securing a job is only part of the reason for low rates of employment after release.
Education is essential to improving reintegration into the labor force. Formerly incarcerated workers experience high rates of job turnover, in part because that is common in the low-skill jobs they find. To improve employment for those like Randall, we should empower more community colleges to offer prison education with a seamless transition into community programs.
Time in prison can be better used to prepare for release. Research shows that intensive treatment and prison education programs reduce recidivism, and incarcerated individuals are eager to take part in them. Yet too many prisoners sit idle during their time in prison or engage in make-work jobs like cleaning and gardening....
Just as the federal government supports local efforts in education, health care and policing, it can support state and local reintegration efforts through funding, technical support and evaluation of promising programs.
Can we afford to support reintegration? Each federal prisoner costs almost $32,000 a year, and in some states that figure is over $80,000. The money saved by reducing imprisonment can create a virtuous cycle if it is reinvested in reintegration, which will result in fewer people returning to prison.
March 17, 2019 at 12:12 PM | Permalink
Comments
The question is one of will, not policy. Over the last decade we have reduced veteran homelessness from about 20-25% of all homeless to between 5%-10% today. So we know HOW to solve these problems. We just don't want want to.
Posted by: Daniel | Mar 17, 2019 8:17:45 PM