« "The Effects of Voluntary and Presumptive Sentencing Guidelines" | Main | Suffolk County DA produces remarkable new prosecutorial polices memo »
March 26, 2019
Spotlighting what the California AG could do to really change capital course in California
John Mills has this notable new Daily Journal commentary following up on recent California capital developments. The main headline of the piece is "Newsom may have halted executions, but the machine keeps on ticking." And the subheadline carries forward the theme: "Gov. Gavin Newsom made history by declaring a moratorium on executions in California and even tweeting out images of the execution chamber being dismantled. Although I was in Sacramento, I missed the announcement. I was in court on one of my death penalty cases."
The full commentary give particular attention to what California's Attorney General might now do to really change the course of capital punishment in the state. I recommend the full piece, and here are excerpts:
Attorney General Xavier Becerra is uniquely positioned to help bring it to a halt. He has called Newsom's reprieve "a bold, new direction in California's march toward perfecting our search for justice." I agree.
But Becerra's statement is remarkable because there is so much that more he could do, large and small, to support that effort beyond defending the governor's decree. Taking up any one of them would be a much better use of state resources than defending hundreds of death sentences that will almost certainly never be carried out.
In the death penalty cases Becerra is currently defending, he could admit in court what Newsom acknowledged in his executive order: California "death sentences are unevenly and unfairly applied to people of color." Supporters and opponents of the death penalty agree that the most obvious impact of race on death sentencing is the race of the victim. This effect is greatest when the defendant is black, and where a crime is committed is a much better predictor of a death sentence than the culpability of the perpetrator. Tragically, we as a state have failed to divorce our country's racist history from our harshest penalties in the present. Admitting as much would clear the way for the courts to hold that California's death penalty is inconsistent with our state's constitutional commitments to equal protection under the law.
Becerra could also confess other defects, any one of which would acknowledge the unconstitutionality of California's death penalty regime. For example, by design, California's death sentencing statute reaches virtually every murder, as studies by preeminent experts have confirmed....
He could admit to other systemic problems, such as the inherent cruelty of languishing under a sentence of death for decades, the lack of required jury findings for aggravating circumstances, and arbitrariness in the process by which a person becomes eligible for execution. Any one of these admissions would be well supported and, if also endorsed by the courts, would bring California's experiment with the death penalty to an end.
He could also take a more case-by-case approach. The commentary in opposition to Newsom's moratorium has suggested that California is special, that whatever problems may be present with the death penalty in other states, just don't affect us. That's a lie....
Even taking the modest steps of not appealing a grant of relief from a death sentence, waiving procedural defenses to claims challenging the legality of a sentence, or asking for an evidentiary hearing in cases where there are troubling claims about sentences of death would each be a leap towards ensuring that justice is done where the stakes are highest.
So far, Becerra has not taken that tack. He has, instead, consistently opposed relief, invoked procedural barriers to reviewing the merits of constitutional claims, and failed to take steps that would expedite, rather than block the delivery of justice.
There are many other actors who could do many other things to mitigate the excesses and arbitrariness inherent to the use of the death penalty. But the reforms proposed here could be accomplished with little or no cost and would demonstrate an executive branch unified in its determination to put justice first. It is time for a bold new direction from the attorney general.
Prior related posts:
- New California Gov to order moratorium on executions in his state
- Rounding up some commentary on Gov Newsom's formal halting of executions in California
- California Gov Newsom, on heels of execution moratorium order, now talking up halt to any capital prosecutions
March 26, 2019 at 03:18 PM | Permalink