« Deputy AG Rosen continues his hypocritical attacks on local prosecutors for "nonenforcement of the law" | Main | Recommending "Good Law | Bad Law" and other podcasts »
December 1, 2019
Father of Parkland school shooting victim urges state prosecutors to abandon capital prosecution of shooter
This opinion piece from Florida, headlined "Parkland parent: Drop death penalty for shooter, let him rot in jail," provides a notable plea to prosecutors from Michael Schulman. Here are excerpts:
On February 14, 2018, my son, Scott J. Beigel, was murdered by this active shooter at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.... I read the Nov. 24 Sun-Sentinel editorial, “Delay the Nikolas Cruz trial or accept his plea,” — and could not agree more.
To put the students and faculty through the trauma of reliving that horrible day is cruel and unnecessary. “Going for the death penalty” will not bring our loved ones back to us. It will not make the physical scars of those wounded go away. In fact, what it will do is to continue the trauma and not allow the victims to heal and get closure.
Understand, that in order to get the death penalty, the state has to take the trial for the murder of our family members to conclusion. In all likelihood, that means many of us would have to testify at the trial and relive February 14, 2018, again and again, as we all sit in a courtroom for weeks.
We would be putting ourselves through this for the chance that the shooter would get what we all believe he deserves: the death penalty. Yet, even following a trial, the shooter could be sentenced to life without parole — the same sentence the shooter has already agreed to accept for in exchange for a guilty plea. Pursuing the death penalty means subjecting ourselves to the trauma of a trial, reliving the murder of our loved ones for a result we could have obtained without that trauma.
Now let’s imagine the jury finds that the shooter should be put to death. The average time an inmate in Florida spends on death row prior to execution is more than 16 years, according to the Florida Department of Corrections. During those 16 years of time, there will be numerous appeals. Imagine if the shooter wins just one of those appeals and a court judge orders a new trial. We will then have to go back to court and re-open our wounds by testifying again. This is not healthy. This will not help us heal and get any kind of closure....
To State Attorney Michael Satz, and to the living victims of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas massacre, let the shooter rot in jail for the rest of his life. Let us try and get some closure! Let us try and move forward with our lives.
Prior related posts:
- Contemplating the capital prosecution of Parkland school shooter Nikolas Cruz
- Will Florida school shooting mass murderer thwart efforts to raise age for limit on application of the death penalty?
- In shadow of Parkland, a notable discussion with victim families about capital prosecutions in Florida
- "Nikolas Cruz’s birth mom had a violent, criminal past. Could it help keep him off Death Row?"
- A year after tragedy, taking stock of the agony (and wondering about the costs) already surrounding the capital prosecution of Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz
December 1, 2019 at 01:13 PM | Permalink
Comments
With cases that involve multiple victims and their families the issue of justice gets complicated. Say some want the trial to push forward so there is the possibility of the death penalty but others want the case to be through and accept the plea deal. How do you balance both parties and their visions of justice? I have witnessed court proceedings involving gruesome murders and death penalty cases and see the type of emotions that come out at trial from the witnesses and the victim's friends and family. It is a lot to take in but they show up to make sure justice is served. In the end it is whether the prosecutor considers the victims and their opinion on what justice is. When you have competing interests from multiple parties plus a highly public case their are very few scenarios where everyone comes out accepting of the results. If I were the prosecutor I would ask each victim/family what their ideal outcome is for the case and proceed based on majority opinion.
Posted by: Marcus Perry | Dec 4, 2019 1:22:38 PM