« Still more reports of growing numbers of prisoners and staffers testing positive for COVID-19 | Main | "Communicating Punishment" »
March 21, 2020
Noticing potency of our culture of death as Denver capital trial moves forward amidst global pandemic
Those of a certain age can recall a time in which certain politicians regularly preached about the importance of promoting a "Culture of Life." As one who follows closely the administration of the death penalty in the US, I have long been inclined to derisively lament what I called a "culture of death" too often leading too many courts and other legal actors to devote, in my view, too much of their scarce resources to capital cases. (I wrote a 2008 article on the topic focused particularly on the Supreme Court: "A Capital Waste of Time? Examining the Supreme Court's 'Culture of Death'.")
These thoughts all came to mind today in these fraught times upon seeing this local article from Denver headlined "Court will not test potential jurors for coronavirus in Adams County death penalty case." Here are the remarkable particulars:
A high-profile death penalty trial in the killing of an Adams County Sheriff’s deputy is going forward despite defense attorneys’ concerns for the health of their client, jurors and court personnel during the novel coronavirus pandemic. Public defenders for Dreion Dearing, 24, argued in court filings that jury selection should not go on as scheduled Friday without screening and testing procedures for the virus in place for prospective jurors.
Dearing is accused of fatally shooting sheriff’s deputy Heath Gumm, 31, during a January 2018 chase. He is charged with first-degree murder and faces the death penalty if convicted, despite the state legislature’s vote to repeal the death sentence in cases filed on or after July 1. The bill has yet to be signed into law by Gov. Jared Polis. The repeal would not apply to Dearing’s case even if Polis signs the bill, which he is expected to do.
Adams County District Court Judge Mark Warner denied the defense’s request for testing Thursday in part because the 17th Judicial District Court has already taken a variety of precautions, including cancelling most proceedings and ordering those who show symptoms or think they may have been exposed to COVID-19 not to come to the courthouse. Chief Judge Emily Anderson also ordered that people in the courthouse be allowed to wear masks and gloves and carry hand sanitizer.
“Based on the foregoing and the reasons set forth on the record on March 18, 2020, the Court will deny the Defendant’s requests concerning individual virus screening of prospective jurors,” Warner wrote in an order filed Thursday, adding that he would have court staff monitor jurors for potential infection and alert any prospective jurors who might have been exposed to the virus if such exposure is discovered. Jury selection will continue as planned on Friday, Warner wrote in his order. Already, jurors have been called to the courthouse in groups of 250 to complete questionnaires, and public defenders have raised concerns about the closeness of those prospective jurors and the possibility that the novel coronavirus is unknowingly spreading among the groups.
“We remain seriously concerned that the court has exposed, at this point, 1,700 people to a virus and we believe a doctor or medical professional needs to tell us how we can safely proceed,” Maureen Cain, director of legislative policy and external communications for the Colorado State Public Defender’s office, said Thursday.
The process to select the 18 jurors in the trial will begin in earnest Friday, despite a request from the district attorney’s office that the proceedings be moved to April 6, which the defense objected to. The trial is expected to last for weeks.
Despite the fact that the President's Coronavirus Guidelines urges all of us to avoid social gatherings "in groups of more than 10 people," it seems that trying to make sure a defendant can be condemned to death is thought so important that we have to bring together nearly 2000 prospective jurors in groups of 250. What?!!?!?!?
If this was going on in Texas (where, notably, two scheduled executions have been postponed as noted here and here), I suppose I could wrap my head around the eagerness for capital business as usual despite a global pandemic. But as the article above highlights, death penalty repeal legislation was passes earlier this year in Colorado, which means it is extraordinarily unlikely the defendant here would get a death sentence or face execution even if convicted. So, in the pursuit of a capital verdict that will not even be worth the paper it is written on, this court is prepared to expose hundred of people to a deadly virus. Got it.
March 21, 2020 at 12:39 PM | Permalink
Comments
Doug:
I agree with you, In Co, it is not just idiotic but irresponsibly risky.
Regarding the time wasted in death penalty cases, that is, primarily due to irresponsible judges, who could, easily, speed up pretrial, trial and appeals.
Virginia has executed 113 murderers within 7 years of FULL appeals, on average, since 1976.
All jurisdictions could do that, with more responsible judicial management.
If you take into account the LWOP realities of pre trial, trial and appeals, death penalty equivalent cases, 30-50 years of maximum security cells, along with that geriatric care, the cost savings of a plea bargain to LWOP (only possible with the death penalty), with those cost savings a credit on the death penalty side of the ledger, there would, most likely, be a substantial cost saving with the death penalty, as I have, often, detailed.
Not one cost study has done that.
Posted by: Dudley Sharp | Mar 22, 2020 10:30:58 AM