« Great coverage and perspectives on incarceration nation thanks to a global pandemic | Main | "The Shadow Bargainers" »
May 20, 2020
Federal judge finds BOP has "made poor progress in transferring" vulnerable inmates out of federal prison COVID hotspot
Last month, as detailed here, US District Judge Judge James Gwin granted a preliminary injunction ordering federal officials to identify, and then start moving out, medically vulnerable prisoners from the Elkton federal prison. Federal officials appealed this order, but a Sixth Circuit panel two weeks ago refused to disturb it. But, as detailed by this new press report concerning this new order from Judge Gwin handed down late yesterday, it appears that BOP is just largely refusing to do what the Judge ordered. Here are the details from the press report:
A judge said Tuesday that officials have not complied with his directive from last month to clear out the sole federal prison in Ohio to address the spread of coronavirus, which has left nine inmates dead and more than 100 others infected. U.S. District Judge James Gwin of Cleveland wrote in a new order that the Federal Bureau of Prisons has made “limited efforts” to protect vulnerable inmates at Federal Correctional Center Elkton. He wrote that the bureau must do more to identify, release and transfer the vulnerable inmates.
“Concerningly, Respondents have made poor progress in transferring subclass members out of Elkton through the various means referenced in the Court’s preliminary injunction Order,” Gwin wrote in the 11-page order.
His new order tells the bureau to take more drastic steps, including loosening requirements on who qualifies for placement on home confinement. If an inmate isn’t eligible for release, officials must explain why in detail, he wrote. Gwin told officials to provide such explanations for at least one-third of the inmates identified at risk every two days until they have accounted for everybody, with the first explanations due to him by the end of business Thursday.
David Carey, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, said that “this order represents recognition by the court that the BOP has failed to meet its obligations. We are certainly hopeful they will do so this time around,” he said....
Elkton, located about 100 miles south of Cleveland in Columbiana County, experienced an outbreak of the virus in recent months. The low-security complex is currently home to more than 2,300 male inmates and includes a central institution and a satellite facility. As of Tuesday, 137 inmates and eight staff members tested positive for the virus. Nine inmates have died....
[T]he ACLU said the bureau had slow-walked its response [to Judge Gwin's April 22 order]. It said the bureau has not, to date, identified any inmates who released on furlough or home confinement. It also said the bureau, which identified 837 inmates as susceptible, left some inmates off its list by not including certain medical conditions and those who are age 65.
The judge agreed. “By thumbing their nose at their authority to authorize home confinement, Respondents threaten staff and they threaten low security inmates,” Gwin wrote.
He directed the prisons bureau to eliminate certain criteria that inmates must meet to qualify confinement. Those include eliminating requirements about length of time an inmate has served and disregarding whether they committed certain low or moderate offenses while in prison. Per his order, an inmate is serving time for a violent crime might may also be eligible for home confinement if it happened more than five years ago. If an inmate cannot be given compassionate release, furloughed or moved to another facility, the prisons bureau must also explain why.
Prior related posts:
- Federal Judge orders BOP to find ways to transfer prisoners "out of Elkton through any means" in the coming weeks
- Feds appealing last week's judicial order to transfer vulnerable prisoners "out of Elkton through any means"
- Sixth Circuit panel refuses to stay district judge order to transfer vulnerable prisoners out of Elkton federal prison "through any means"
May 20, 2020 at 09:41 AM | Permalink
Comments
Doug: Do you think that Tuesday's Order by Judge Gwin has set teh stage for him to hold BOP officials in criminal contempt of court, if they now fail to timely comply with his clarified orders? If he holds BOP and/or DOJ officials in criminal contempt, I wonder if he will only fine them (with the fines ultimately being paid by the Government), or whether he might actually incarcerate official from the Warden to the Director of the BOP, to a Deputy Attorney General of the Criminal Division of the DOJ, until compliance with his Orders occurs. There are lives on the line here, and time is definitely of the essence. It will be fascinating to see how this unfolds.
Posted by: James Gormley | May 21, 2020 9:19:21 AM
I am 100% confident not BOP official will be incarcerated, James. And DOJ is now appealing this case to SCOTUS...
Posted by: Doug B | May 21, 2020 9:45:12 AM