« "The Case for a Federal Criminal Court System (and Sentencing Reform)" | Main | Despite a short work week, still another long list of new COVID-influenced federal sentence reductions using § 3582(c)(1)(A) »

May 31, 2020

"Unconstitutional Incarceration: Applying Strict Scrutiny to Criminal Sentences"

The title of this post is the title of this new Yale Law Journal note authored by Salil Dudani.  Here is its abstract:

The deprivation of a fundamental right triggers strict scrutiny, and freedom from physical restraint is a fundamental right.  Indeed, the right to be free from physical restraint lies at the very core of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause.  In the contexts of pretrial detention and civil commitment, courts hold that due process prohibits unnecessary incarceration and requires the government to prove the necessity of incarceration in each individual case.  Without explanation, courts do not apply these same principles to criminal sentences, which just as surely infringe on physical liberty.  This Note argues that they should: there is no good reason to exempt sentences of confinement from the fundamental due-process right to freedom from physical restraint.  If the government cannot prove that a criminal sentence is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest, the sentence is unconstitutional, even when it is purportedly required by a statute establishing a “mandatory minimum sentence” for the crime of conviction.  The Note discusses how courts should implement this scrutiny and suggests that state courts should lead the way in doing so.

May 31, 2020 at 01:46 PM | Permalink

Comments

Does unconstitutional incarceration also include civil commitment? Speaking of that, I wonder if Minnesota's unrest over the Floyd killing has spread not only to its prisons, but to the Stillwater Civil Commitment Center for ex-sex offenders. One would think if any inmates in Minnesota would become radical agitators at all, it would definitely be the Mooselake detainees at the civil commitment center. They have no incentive to behave as they seldom get freedom, and, therefore, nothing to lose by becoming militant agitators like Attica's inmates over forty years ago!

Posted by: William Delzell | Jun 1, 2020 8:35:06 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB