« Interesting review of African (and global) trends in capital punishment abolition | Main | "Death Penalty Exceptionalism and Administrative Law" »
July 25, 2021
US Sentencing Commission releases more detailed "Compassionate Release Data Report" for 2020
As detailed in this post, last month the US Sentencing Commission released a short data report titled "Compassionate Release Data." That report provided notable but very basic numbers on the grants and denials of federal compassionate release motions nationwide for calendar year 2020. The report revealed, as further discussed in this follow-up post, that judges granted a good number of these motions once COVID hit, but that the Bureau of Prisons approved stunningly few compassionate release applications and that there were considerable disparities in grant rates in different judicial districts.
I was quite pleased to see the USSC promulgate any compassionate release data, but I was eager for additional data beyond circuit and district breakdowns of these motions. In my prior post, I hoped we might at some point see "a lot more offender demographic information (e.g., race, gender, age of movant) and sentence modification information (e.g., primary sentenced offense and amount of sentence reduction)." Excitingly, the USSC has now released this updated expanded data report that provides a lot more details about compassionate release grants for calendar year 2020.
Specifically, this latest report includes data on "Demographic Characteristics Of Offenders Receiving Compassionate Release" and on "Selected Sentencing Factors For Offenders Receiving Compassionate Release" and on "Type Of Crime For Offenders Receiving Compassionate Release" and on "Original Sentence Length For Offenders Receiving Compassionate Release." I am so very pleased to see this additional data, although the extent of sentence reductions is still a data point not covered which seems to me to be important to understand the full compassionate release story (e.g.,ten granted sentence reduction motions that reduce sentences by five months seem quite different than ten granted motions reducing sentences by five years.)
Upon first glace, it is hard to see if there are any particularly distinctive or disturbing patterns in this enhanced USSC compassionate release data. Interestingly, looking at the demographics, I noticed that the percentage of black prisoners securing a sentence reduction in 2020 (which was 45.2% according to the USSC data) appears to be greater than the percentage of black prisoners in federal prison (which was 34.9% as of this USSC report with March 2021 data). Likewise, I was intrigued to see that the percentage of prisoners convicted of drug trafficking securing a sentence reduction in 2020 (which was 53% according to the USSC data) appears to be greater than the percentage of such prisoners in federal prison (which was 43% as of this same USSC report).
I hope that the US Sentencing Commission not only continues to release more and more granular data about sentencing reduction grants. I also hope the USSC will (a) track recidivism rates for this population over time, and (b) learn about which guidelines might be seen to produce excessively long sentencing in retrospect as documented through these grants. The kind of second-look sentencing mechanism now operating the the federal system is not only valuable and important as a means to achieve better justice in individual cases, but also should serve as an important feedback loop providing a kind of on-going audit of the operation of the entire federal sentencing system.
A few of many prior related posts:
- US Sentencing Commission releases fascinating (and bare bones) "Compassionate Release Data Report"
- More good coverage of the not-so-good (but still not-so-bad) realities of federal compassionate release realities
- Notable data on BOP resistance to compassionate release requests from federal prisoners
- "How Compassionate? Political Appointments and District Court Judge Responses to Compassionate Release during COVID-19"
- Tangible example of continuing big sentence reductions in COVID era thanks to the FIRST STEP Act
- Spotlighting remarkable (but still cursory) data on "compassionate release" after FIRST STEP Act
- Notable new review and accounting of COVID and federal compassionate release results
- Another dive into the ugly BOP realities of federal compassionate release during the pandemic
July 25, 2021 at 02:21 PM | Permalink
Comments
What is disturbing about the data - which is something I have long predicted - is the extent to which the scattershot approach to compassionate release is contributing to unwarranted sentencing disparities.
For instance, defendants from the Northern District of Illinois have a 38.2% likelihood of compassionate release, those from Central Illinois a 21.3% chance, but those poor defendants in the Southern District of Illinois only a 10.3% chance.
About 70% of compassionate release motions (67 of 96) were granted in Oregon. A shocking 1.5% (5 out of 337 requests) were granted in the Western District of North Carolina (Charlotte). Maybe Oregon was granting them arbitrarily, or Charlotte was denying them arbitrarily. But these deviations from the average suggest that similarly situated defendants were treated quite differently in different parts of the country.
The last thing this system needs is more arbitrariness and chaos.
Posted by: Tom Root | Jul 27, 2021 1:11:51 PM