« Rounding up some criminal justice postings from Marijuana Law, Policy & Reform | Main | Firing squad execution stayed, while another execution date set, by South Carolina Supreme Court »

April 20, 2022

Great panel series to explore "The Role of the U.S. Sentencing Commission in Decarceration: First Step Act and Beyond"

CJHDI keep hoping and hoping that we will be getting nominations from Prez Biden to the US Sentencing Commission just about any day now. Excitingly, even while being kept waiting for long-overdue USSC nominations, I can now look forward to a weekly panel series dedicated to examining thoroughly and thoughtfully what new nominees should be doing.  Specifically, the Center for Justice and Human Dignity (CJHD) is presenting a series of panels on the "Role of the U.S. Sentencing Commission in Decarceration: First Step Act and Beyond," which will run Tuesdays at 12noon ET from May 3 through May 24.

CJHD is a nonprofit organization whose mission is explained here in terms of seeking "to reduce prison incarceration in the United States while improving conditions for those imprisoned and working inside.  We promote values of human dignity and shared safety while keeping in mind the needs of survivors, directly impacted people, and society at large. Alongside diverse partners, we collaborate with judges on alternative sentencing, correctional leaders on the conditions of confinement, and policymakers on early release strategies."

This events page provides this account of this panel series:

While the President considers the U.S. Sentencing Commission appointments, judges and judicial-focused organizations are examining how the agency might better address the myriad ways its guidelines impact mass incarceration.  The nation has an opportunity to reimagine how the Commission might use its authority to further decarceration efforts and address other system disparities through its guidelines and policy statements.

During this symposium, judges, scholars and practitioners will share their thoughts on these topics and reflect on how legislation like the First Step Act has expanded the use of compassionate release and other opportunities for decarceration.

Over the course of four weeks in May, this virtual symposium will offer weekly panels addressing how the U.S. Sentencing Commission can be supportive of federal alternative to incarceration programming, sentencing review mechanisms, promising practices from state sentencing commissions, and changes to the guidelines practitioners and other leaders in the field are interested in seeing once commissioners are appointed.

The Role of the U.S. Sentencing Commission in Decarceration: First Step Act and Beyond. A weekly panel discussion, Tuesdays at 12pm ET, May 3-24, 2022 Click here to register online

I had the pleasure of helping just a bit in planning some of the topics for these panels, as well as the great honor of moderating one part of this important discussion. The speakers involved are really great, and I am looking forward to the whole series (and I sure hope we finally have some Commissions nominees from Prez Biden before the series concludes).

April 20, 2022 at 05:42 PM | Permalink

Comments

Will the discussion groups have any viewpoint diversity, or will it all be on the side of less accountability for persons convicted of crime?

Posted by: Bill Otis | Apr 20, 2022 7:11:10 PM

Do you always view less prison time as less accountability, Bill? Since most of the Jan 6 lawbreakers are getting no or very short prison terms, would you say they are being held less accountable than most others convicted of crimes?

Posted by: Doug B. | Apr 20, 2022 7:42:33 PM

Doug --

"Do you always view less prison time as less accountability, Bill?"

Pretty much, sure. It's certainly not more accountability.

"Since most of the Jan 6 lawbreakers are getting no or very short prison terms, would you say they are being held less accountable than most others convicted of crimes?"

"Most others convicted of crimes" is too big a bunch for me to process for a comment like this, but I'd be happier, in this instance as in most others, if the guidelines got more respect than they seem to be getting.

Not that any of this is germane to my main point, which is that the program certainly seems to be ideologically monochromatic, and that's unfortunate. More gets learned when ideas are tested than when everyone's singing the same tune.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Apr 20, 2022 8:42:16 PM

Do you have any indication from the White House when they might nominate individuals for the USSC?

Posted by: Luke Brooker | Apr 20, 2022 10:26:47 PM

Bill: your point about viewpoint diversity is well taken, but I only give guidelines respect when they deserve it. (My sense is the Jan 6 folks are getting mostly within-guideline sentences, BTW.)

Luke: I am hoping we might see USSC nominations this week or next, but I have been saying that to myself for most of 2022. Eventually that wish will come true. Sigh.

Posted by: Doug B. | Apr 21, 2022 9:44:28 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB