« Spotlighting the ugly problems with incarceration deaths (and with data collection by the Justice Department) | Main | Kentucky parole board orders school shooter to serve out the remainder of his life sentence »

September 26, 2022

Another look at Oregon's drug decriminalization efforts now a few years in

A have done periodic posts (some linked below) over the last couple of years based on press accounts of Oregon's drug decriminalization efforts after state residents in Fall 2020 passed Measure 110 to makes possession of small amounts of various illicit drugs punishable by only a civil citation.  This new AP article, headlined "After rocky start, hopes up in Oregon drug decriminalization," provides the latest "updates from the front."  Here are excerpts:

Two years after Oregon residents voted to decriminalize hard drugs and dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars to treatment, few people have requested the services and the state has been slow to channel the funds.

When voters passed the state’s pioneering Drug Addiction Treatment and Recovery Act in 2020, the emphasis was on treatment as much as on decriminalizing possession of personal-use amounts of heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and other drugs.

But Oregon still has among the highest addiction rates in the country. Fatal overdoses have increased almost 20% over the previous year, with over a thousand dead. Over half of addiction treatment programs in the state lack capacity to meet demand because they don’t have enough staffing and funding, according to testimony before lawmakers.

Supporters want more states to follow Oregon’s lead, saying decriminalization reduces the stigma of addiction and keeps people who use drugs from going to jail and being saddled with criminal records. How Oregon is faring will almost certainly be taken into account if another state considers decriminalizing.

Steve Allen, behavioral health director of the Oregon Health Authority, acknowledged the rocky start, even as he announced a “true milestone” has been reached, with more than $302 million being sent to facilities to help people get off drugs, or at least use them more safely. “The road to get here has not been easy. Oregon is the first state to try such a bold and transformative approach,” Allen told a state Senate committee Wednesday.

One expert, though, told the lawmakers the effort is doomed unless people with addictions are nudged into treatment. “If there is no formal or informal pressure on addicted people to seek treatment and recovery and thereby stop using drugs, we should expect continuing high rates of drug use, addiction and attendant harm,” said Keith Humphreys, an addiction researcher and professor at Stanford University and former senior adviser in the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy.

Of 16,000 people who accessed services in the first year of decriminalization, only 0.85% entered treatment, the health authority said. A total of 60% received “harm reduction” like syringe exchanges and overdose medications. An additional 15% got help with housing needs, and 12% obtained peer support....

Under the law, people receive a citation, with the maximum $100 fine waived if they call a hotline for a health assessment.  But most of the more than 3,100 tickets issued so far have been ignored, Oregon Public Broadcasting reported. Few people have dialed the hotline.

Tera Hurst, executive director of Oregon Health Justice Recovery Alliance, which is focused on implementing Measure 110, said coerced treatment is ineffective. Hurst said it’s important to focus on “just building a system of care to make sure that people who need access can get access.”  Allen called the outlay of million of dollars — which come from taxes on Oregon’s legal marijuana industry — a “pivotal moment.”...

Centro Latino Americano, a nonprofit serving Latino immigrant families, plans to use its $4.5 million share to move treatment services to a bigger space and hire more staff, said manager Basilio Sandoval.  “Measure 110 makes it possible for us to provide this service free of charge,” Sandoval said. “This allows us to reach people we could not serve previously because of a lack of insurance.”

Scott Winkels, lobbyist for the League of Oregon Cities, said residents are running out of patience.  “People are going to need to see progress,” Winkels said.  “If you’re living in a community where you’re finding needles, how many times do you need to see a needle in a park before you lose your cool?”

Some prior related posts:

September 26, 2022 at 01:03 PM | Permalink

Comments

"But Oregon still has among the highest addiction rates in the country. Fatal overdoses have increased almost 20% over the previous year, with over a thousand dead."

Well, hey, look, they were going to die sometime anyway, and the point is not to reduce deaths; the point is to Show That Oregon Is Virtuous.

Still, this lethal program will be proclaimed a success, and even if it's not, it will be someone else's fault -- as ever.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Sep 27, 2022 8:18:04 PM

Bill - Oregon's (or the majority of Oregon voters) intention was to reduce the stigma of a criminal record in connection with drug use. Criminalization of drugs only makes it more likely that those affected will be caught up in the cycle of crime (inability to get a job, housing, etc) and if we can do things that reduce the likelihood that people will be caught up in crime (emphasizing drug treatment, alternatives to incarceration) those things should be done. I know you believe in a "punishment" and a "sober" approach to crime but those approaches only produce skyrocketing failure (recidivism rates) and a marginalized population (as you often point out, three quarters of those released from prison are arrested again within five years). Brett Miler

Posted by: Brett Miler | Sep 28, 2022 11:05:47 AM

Brett --

It is not up to society to tuck its tail between its legs and arrange itself so that citizens will pretty-please obey the law. It is up to citizens to obey it on their own, simply because that is what citizenship means, and also because it is wrong to produce social harm by committing crime. Those who will not learn this lesson justifiably bear the consequences of their choices and their behavior.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Sep 28, 2022 5:00:38 PM

Bill - I just think that if we address the causes that induce individuals into the cycle of crime (trauma, poverty, poor education) we can do a better job of reducing crime than your "punishment first" approach. Punishment fails to teach people how to behave and addressing social deficits can go a long way. Brett Miler

Posted by: Brett Miler | Sep 28, 2022 7:16:17 PM

Bill - I just think that if we address the causes that induce individuals into the cycle of crime (trauma, poverty, poor education) we can do a better job of reducing crime than your "punishment first" approach. Punishment fails to teach people how to behave and addressing social deficits can go a long way. Brett Miler

Posted by: Brett Miler | Sep 28, 2022 7:16:18 PM

That’s great, Brett. We should be treating the causes, such as bastardy.

However, that doesn’t mean we give a pass to those already in that cycle. In fact, all the more reason to lock them up. Keep them from continuing the cycle.

Posted by: TarlsQtr | Sep 28, 2022 7:36:05 PM

Tarls - A less punitive system may be healthier in the long term as we can become more knowledgeable about the biological and social causes of violence and other criminal behavior and we also may become a more empathetic society toward those who get swept up in crime. Brett Miler

Posted by: Brett Miler | Sep 29, 2022 9:05:02 AM

Swept up? You make it sound like these guys have no say in their criminal lives. They are the ones with the “empathy” problem.

Letting proven criminals out of prison does nothing to make us “more knowledgable about the biological and social causes of violence and other criminal choices.” In fact, we already know. Bastardy, absent fathers, parents involved in crime, etc.

The left just won’t admit they are the problems. Traditional values=bad. Selfish hedonistic pleasure=good. Until the left admits what is in front of their faces, I cannot take them seriously about reducing crime.

Posted by: TarlsQtr | Sep 29, 2022 11:06:49 PM

So "Bastardy, absent fathers, parents involved in crime, etc" leads to criminality ... somebody better keep a close eye on Tiffany Trump! Jokes aside, Tarls, I think the left shares your broad view that social factors are criminogenic, they just tend to focus on other social factors.

Posted by: Doug B. | Sep 30, 2022 8:58:56 AM

Doug --

The main things by a huge margin that cause crime are (1) greed, (2) insufficiently developed conscience, (3) lack of self-control, and (4) lack of empathy for victims -- that is, lack of fully understanding that other people have the same feelings of loss that you do.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Oct 1, 2022 12:15:22 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB